BACKGROUND: Hospital-based violence prevention programs have emerged at trauma centers nationwide; however, none has been thoroughly evaluated for effectiveness. Our Violence Intervention Program (VIP) conducted a prospective randomized control study to evaluate the effectiveness of intervention for repeat victims of violence. METHOD:Patients admitted between 1999 and 2001 for treatment of injuries inflicted by a violent act were identified. Repeat victims of violence on parole/probation were invited to join the study. Participants were given a history-gathering questionnaire and randomized into two groups. Cases (intervention [n = 56]) received intensive psychosocial follow-up services, family or group therapy, and assisted with substance abuse treatment. Controls (nonintervention [n = 44]) received standard medical treatment and follow-through in accordance with standard parole or probation procedures. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the number of arrests in the two groups. The control group was three times more likely to be arrested for a violent crime, two times more likely to be convicted of any crime, and four times more likely to be convicted of a violent crime. The projected time of incarceration is significantly longer for the control group. Repeat violent criminal activity was significantly more evident in the control group. CONCLUSION: Significant differences exist between the VIP intervention and nonintervention groups in terms of the quantity and severity of criminal activity.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Hospital-based violence prevention programs have emerged at trauma centers nationwide; however, none has been thoroughly evaluated for effectiveness. Our Violence Intervention Program (VIP) conducted a prospective randomized control study to evaluate the effectiveness of intervention for repeat victims of violence. METHOD:Patients admitted between 1999 and 2001 for treatment of injuries inflicted by a violent act were identified. Repeat victims of violence on parole/probation were invited to join the study. Participants were given a history-gathering questionnaire and randomized into two groups. Cases (intervention [n = 56]) received intensive psychosocial follow-up services, family or group therapy, and assisted with substance abuse treatment. Controls (nonintervention [n = 44]) received standard medical treatment and follow-through in accordance with standard parole or probation procedures. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the number of arrests in the two groups. The control group was three times more likely to be arrested for a violent crime, two times more likely to be convicted of any crime, and four times more likely to be convicted of a violent crime. The projected time of incarceration is significantly longer for the control group. Repeat violent criminal activity was significantly more evident in the control group. CONCLUSION: Significant differences exist between the VIP intervention and nonintervention groups in terms of the quantity and severity of criminal activity.
Authors: Patrick M Carter; Maureen A Walton; Manya F Newton; Michael Clery; Lauren K Whiteside; Marc A Zimmerman; Rebecca M Cunningham Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2013-07-08 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Megan L Ranney; Jonathan Fletcher; Harrison Alter; Christopher Barsotti; Vikhyat S Bebarta; Marian E Betz; Patrick M Carter; Magdalena Cerdá; Rebecca M Cunningham; Peter Crane; Jahan Fahimi; Matthew J Miller; Ali Rowhani-Rahbar; Jody A Vogel; Garen J Wintemute; Muhammad Waseem; Manish N Shah Journal: Ann Emerg Med Date: 2016-12-18 Impact factor: 5.721
Authors: Patrick M Carter; Aaron D Dora-Laskey; Jason E Goldstick; Justin E Heinze; Maureen A Walton; Marc A Zimmerman; Jessica S Roche; Rebecca M Cunningham Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2018-10-19 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Steven D Langerman; Gia M Badolato; Alexandra Rucker; Lenore Jarvis; Shilpa J Patel; Monika K Goyal Journal: J Adolesc Health Date: 2019-07-31 Impact factor: 5.012
Authors: Rebecca M Cunningham; Maureen A Walton; Abby Goldstein; Stephen T Chermack; Jean T Shope; C Raymond Bingham; Marc A Zimmerman; Frederic C Blow Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 2009-11 Impact factor: 3.451
Authors: Rebecca M Cunningham; Regan Murray; Maureen A Walton; Stephen T Chermack; Marcin Wojnar; Piotr Wozniak; Brenda M Booth; Frederic C Blow Journal: Ann Emerg Med Date: 2009-03-12 Impact factor: 5.721
Authors: Kyle R Fischer; Henry Schwimmer; Jonathan Purtle; Daniel Roman; Shannon Cosgrove; J J Current; Michael B Greene Journal: J Community Health Date: 2018-04