| Literature DB >> 16966677 |
Martha Zaslow1, Tamara Halle, Laurie Martin, Natasha Cabrera, Julia Calkins, Lindsay Pitzer, Nancy Geyelin Margie.
Abstract
This article assesses whether there are methodological problems with child outcome measures that may contribute to the small associations between child care quality and child outcomes found in the literature. Outcome measures used in 65 studies of child care quality published between 1979 and December 2005 were examined, taking the previous review by Vandell and Wolfe (2000) as the starting point. Serious methodological problems were not pervasive for child outcome measures. However, methodological concerns were most prevalent among measures of socioemotional development. Furthermore, psychometric information on outcome measures was often missing from published reports, and health outcomes and approaches to learning were infrequently studied. Future research should address alignment issues between aspects of quality and the specific child outcomes chosen for study.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2006 PMID: 16966677 DOI: 10.1177/0193841X06291529
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eval Rev ISSN: 0193-841X