PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the extent of the variation in the position of the prostate bed with respect to the bony anatomy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Four patients were treated to 70 Gy in 35 fractions. Before each fraction, a megavoltage computed tomography (CT) of the prostate bed was obtained, resulting in a total of 140 CT studies. Retrospectively, each CT scan was aligned to the simulation kilovoltage scan based on bony anatomy and the prostate bed. The difference between the 2 alignments was calculated for each scan. RESULTS: The average differences (+/-1 SD) between the two alignments were 0.06+/-0.37, 0.10+/-0.86, and 0.39+/-1.27 mm in the lateral, longitudinal (SI), and vertical (AP) directions, respectively. Laterally, there was no difference>or=3 mm. The cumulative frequency of SI differences were as follows; >or=3 mm: 3%, >or=4 mm: 1%, and >or=5 mm: 1% (maximum: 5 mm). The cumulative frequency of AP differences were as follows; >or=3 mm: 7%, and >or=4 mm: 3% (maximum: 4 mm). CONCLUSION: In patients with prostate cancer receiving postoperative radiotherapy, the prostate bed motion relative to the pelvic bony anatomy is of a relatively small magnitude. Significant motion (>or=3 mm) is infrequent. However, small differences between the prostate bed and the bony anatomy still exist. This might have implications on treatment margins when daily alignment on bony anatomy is performed.
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the extent of the variation in the position of the prostate bed with respect to the bony anatomy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Four patients were treated to 70 Gy in 35 fractions. Before each fraction, a megavoltage computed tomography (CT) of the prostate bed was obtained, resulting in a total of 140 CT studies. Retrospectively, each CT scan was aligned to the simulation kilovoltage scan based on bony anatomy and the prostate bed. The difference between the 2 alignments was calculated for each scan. RESULTS: The average differences (+/-1 SD) between the two alignments were 0.06+/-0.37, 0.10+/-0.86, and 0.39+/-1.27 mm in the lateral, longitudinal (SI), and vertical (AP) directions, respectively. Laterally, there was no difference>or=3 mm. The cumulative frequency of SI differences were as follows; >or=3 mm: 3%, >or=4 mm: 1%, and >or=5 mm: 1% (maximum: 5 mm). The cumulative frequency of AP differences were as follows; >or=3 mm: 7%, and >or=4 mm: 3% (maximum: 4 mm). CONCLUSION: In patients with prostate cancer receiving postoperative radiotherapy, the prostate bed motion relative to the pelvic bony anatomy is of a relatively small magnitude. Significant motion (>or=3 mm) is infrequent. However, small differences between the prostate bed and the bony anatomy still exist. This might have implications on treatment margins when daily alignment on bony anatomy is performed.
Authors: J F Langenhuijsen; R Donker; G M McColl; L A L M Kiemeney; J A Witjes; E N J T van Lin Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2013-04-21 Impact factor: 3.621
Authors: Ronaldo Cavalieri; Hiram A Gay; Jingxia Liu; Maria C Ferreira; Helvecio C Mota; Claudio H Sibata; Ron R Allison Journal: Radiat Oncol Date: 2011-10-24 Impact factor: 3.481
Authors: Florent Vilotte; Mickael Antoine; Maxime Bobin; Igor Latorzeff; Stéphane Supiot; Pierre Richaud; Laurence Thomas; Nicolas Leduc; Stephane Guérif; Jone Iriondo-Alberdi; Renaud de Crevoisier; Paul Sargos Journal: Front Oncol Date: 2017-03-09 Impact factor: 6.244
Authors: Sara Elakshar; James Man Git Tsui; Michael Jonathan Kucharczyk; Nada Tomic; Ziad Simon Fawaz; Boris Bahoric; Joseph Papayanatos; Ahmad Chaddad; Tamim Niazi Journal: Technol Cancer Res Treat Date: 2019-01-01
Authors: Mona Splinter; Tilman Bostel; Ilias Sachpazidis; Tobias Fechter; Constantinos Zamboglou; Oliver Jäkel; Peter E Huber; Jürgen Debus; Dimos Baltas; Nils H Nicolay Journal: Front Oncol Date: 2019-11-08 Impact factor: 6.244