Literature DB >> 16965902

Trans-sinusal maxillary distraction for correction of midfacial hypoplasia: long-term clinical results.

N Nadjmi1, F Schutyser, R Van Erum.   

Abstract

Maxillary distraction osteogenesis is indicated in severe angle class III malocclusions, and severe maxillary hypoplasia among some cleft patients and other craniofacial deformities. Twenty patients, aged 8-48 years (mean 17.8+/-10.5 SD) with maxillary and midfacial hypoplasia were treated. The follow-up period was 13-65 months (mean 35+/-16.3 SD). A trans-sinusal maxillary distractor was placed intraorally at each side of the maxilla. The distraction vector was predicted using specialist software, and was transferred to the patients using stereolithographic models and individual templates. A (high) Le Fort I type osteotomy was performed. The amount of activation varied from 8 to 17.5 mm (mean 13.1+/-2.9 SD). Soft and hard tissue formation resulted in complete healing across the distraction gaps. The distractors are almost completely submerged, and can be left in place as long as necessary to avoid relapse. Wit's appraisal was used to measure the stability of the long-term distraction results. Results up to 5 years after distraction showed considerable maxillary advancement with long-term stability. Ongoing growth of the facial skeleton must be considered when distraction osteogenesis is chosen in growing patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16965902     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2006.06.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0901-5027            Impact factor:   2.789


  4 in total

1.  Limitations of internal distraction devices in mature patients with cleft lip and palate and severe midface hypoplasia.

Authors:  Jan Rustemeyer; Alexander Busch; Andreas Bremerich
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2011-07-27

Review 2.  Long-term skeletal stability after maxillary advancement with distraction osteogenesis in cleft lip and palate patients.

Authors:  Humam Saltaji; Michael P Major; Mostafa Altalibi; Mohamed Youssef; Carlos Flores-Mir
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2012-04-12       Impact factor: 2.079

3.  Biomechanical comparison of two intraoperative mobilization techniques for maxillary distraction osteogenesis: Down-fracture versus non-down-fracture.

Authors:  Lili Yang; Eduardo Yugo Suzuki; Boonsiva Suzuki
Journal:  Ann Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2014 Jul-Dec

4.  The role of distraction osteogenesis in the management of craniofacial syndromes.

Authors:  Andrew A Heggie; Ricky Kumar; Jocelyn M Shand
Journal:  Ann Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2013-01
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.