Literature DB >> 16965874

Is the type of test used for mass colorectal cancer screening a determinant of compliance? A cluster-randomized controlled trial comparing fecal occult blood testing with flexible sigmoidoscopy.

Antonio Federici1, Chiara Marinacci, Marialuisa Mangia, Piero Borgia, Paolo Giorgi Rossi, Gabriella Guasticchi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of colorectal cancer screening has been proved, and three different screening tests are recommended by international guidelines: the faecal occult blood test, flexible sigmoidoscopy and colonoscopy. While the effectiveness of a screening program depends on the compliance obtained, the role of the type of test on compliance has not yet been sufficiently studied. AIMS: To measure the effect of the type of screening test used, i.e. faecal occult blood test or flexible sigmoidoscopy, on the compliance to colorectal cancer screening programs. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A cluster-randomized two-arm trial was conducted. We randomly assigned 20 GP's practices that had an average of 150 patients between 50 and 74 years old.
RESULTS: 1449 individuals were referred to faecal occult blood test and 1538 to flexible sigmoidoscopy. The faecal occult blood test obtained higher compliance: 17.2% (95%CI 12.5-25.7) versus 7.0% (95%CI 5.7-9.0). The socio-economic status was an effect modifier of the test type: the effect of the type of test was smaller in low socioeconomic classes.
CONCLUSIONS: The type of screening test used for colorectal cancer is a determinant of participation. In a low compliance area, better compliance will result from offering the faecal occult blood test than from the flexible sigmoidoscopy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16965874     DOI: 10.1016/j.cdp.2006.03.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Detect Prev        ISSN: 0361-090X


  5 in total

1.  Barriers to colorectal cancer screening: a case-control study.

Authors:  Shan-Rong Cai; Su-Zhan Zhang; Hong-Hong Zhu; Shu Zheng
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-05-28       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Cluster randomized trials of cancer screening interventions: are appropriate statistical methods being used?

Authors:  Catherine M Crespi; Annette E Maxwell; Sheng Wu
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2011-03-05       Impact factor: 2.226

3.  Can colorectal cancer mass-screening organization be evidence-based? Lessons from failures: the experimental and pilot phases of the Lazio program.

Authors:  Antonio Federici; Alessandra Barca; Diego Baiocchi; Francesco Quadrino; Sabrina Valle; Piero Borgia; Gabriella Guasticchi; Paolo Giorgi Rossi
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2008-09-19       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 4.  Colorectal Cancer Screening in Average Risk Populations: Evidence Summary.

Authors:  Jill Tinmouth; Emily T Vella; Nancy N Baxter; Catherine Dubé; Michael Gould; Amanda Hey; Nofisat Ismaila; Bronwen R McCurdy; Lawrence Paszat
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2016-08-14

Review 5.  Effect of flexible sigmoidoscopy-based screening on incidence and mortality of colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  B Joseph Elmunzer; Rodney A Hayward; Philip S Schoenfeld; Sameer D Saini; Amar Deshpande; Akbar K Waljee
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2012-12-04       Impact factor: 11.069

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.