Literature DB >> 16965313

Eliciting patient treatment preferences: A strategy to integrate evidence-based and patient-centered care.

Souraya Sidani1, Dana Epstein, Joyal Miranda.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The integrated patient-centered evidence-based approach to care is integral to guide practice and enhance the quality of care. In this paper, a strategy to operationalize the integrated approach is described. DESCRIPTION OF STRATEGY: The strategy flows from the processes used to synthesize the best available evidence for interventions that address a clinical problem, and to elicit patient preferences for treatment options, which is an important step in patient-centered care. The strategy consists of three phases: (1) synthesis of evidence about the effectiveness and relevance of interventions derived from research and practice; (2) generation of written material describing the nature, dose, effectiveness, and risks associated with the evidence-based interventions; and (3) using the written descriptions to elicit patient preferences. Examples from an ongoing study are presented to illustrate the implementation of the strategy within the context of research. IMPLICATIONS: Nurses are invited to apply the strategy in practice and to evaluate its feasibility and utility in enhancing the quality of care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16965313     DOI: 10.1111/j.1741-6787.2006.00060.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Worldviews Evid Based Nurs        ISSN: 1545-102X            Impact factor:   2.931


  11 in total

1.  Conjoint analysis: a 'new' way to evaluate patients' preferences.

Authors:  Sarah T Hawley
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2008-12-01       Impact factor: 3.883

2.  What Do Patients Want? Patient Preference in Wound Care.

Authors:  Lisa Q Corbett; William J Ennis
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 4.730

3.  Likelihood of Attending Treatment for Anxiety Among Veteran Primary Care Patients: Patient Preferences for Treatment Attributes.

Authors:  Robyn L Shepardson; Jennifer S Funderburk
Journal:  J Clin Psychol Med Settings       Date:  2016-09

4.  Assessment of preferences for treatment: validation of a measure.

Authors:  Souraya Sidani; Dana R Epstein; Richard R Bootzin; Patricia Moritz; Joyal Miranda
Journal:  Res Nurs Health       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 2.228

5.  Health Problems and APN Interventions in Pregnant Women with Diabetes.

Authors:  Dorothy Brooten; Joanne M Youngblut; Jean Hannan; Frank Guido-Sanz; Donna Felber Neff; Wannee Deoisres
Journal:  Pac Rim Int J Nurs Res Thail       Date:  2012-04

6.  Anxiety treatment preferences among veteran primary care patients: Demographic, mental health, and treatment-related correlates.

Authors:  Robyn L Shepardson; Katherine A Buckheit; Jennifer S Funderburk
Journal:  Fam Syst Health       Date:  2021-09-02       Impact factor: 1.569

7.  Quantifying Preferences of Farmers and Veterinarians for National Animal Health Programs: The Example of Bovine Mastitis and Antimicrobial Usage in Switzerland.

Authors:  Bart H P van den Borne; Felix J S van Soest; Martin Reist; Henk Hogeveen
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2017-06-02

8.  Nurses' Perception of a Tailored Web-Based Intervention for the Self-Management of Pain After Cardiac Surgery.

Authors:  Geraldine Martorella; Lucinda Graven; Glenna Schluck; Mélanie Bérubé; Céline Gélinas
Journal:  SAGE Open Nurs       Date:  2018-11-21

9.  Preferences for active and aggressive intervention among patients with advanced cancer.

Authors:  Vincent Maida; Jonathan Peck; Marguerite Ennis; Navjot Brar; Alexandria R Maida
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 4.430

10.  Older Adults' Attitudes towards Cognitive Testing: Moving towards Person-Centeredness.

Authors:  Sara Wong; Claudia Jacova
Journal:  Dement Geriatr Cogn Dis Extra       Date:  2018-10-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.