Literature DB >> 16964589

The role of (18)F-FDG-PET imaging for the selection of liver transplantation candidates among hepatocellular carcinoma patients.

Sung Hoon Yang1, Kyung-Suk Suh, Hae Won Lee, Eung-Ho Cho, Jai Young Cho, Yong Beom Cho, Nam-Joon Yi, Kuhn Uk Lee.   

Abstract

Positron emission tomography (PET) using F-18 fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose ((18)F-FDG) is now well established as a noninvasive diagnostic tool for the detection of a variety of malignant tumors. However, in the case of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), several investigators have reported controversial conclusions and an inadequate sensitivity for PET (50-55%). Nevertheless, a high positive rate of (18)F-FDG accumulation has been reported in patients with high-grade HCC and in those with markedly elevated alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) levels. Here, we retrospectively reviewed 38 HCC cases that received liver transplantation (LT) at our center between November 2000 and July 2004 and underwent whole-body PET imaging. (18)F-FDG uptake was assessed in the liver, and its prognostic significance was investigated. Of 38 patients enrolled, 13 patients had positive PET scans for a liver tumor. When we analyzed the association between tumor factors and PET+ (greater PET lesion uptake) in the liver, preoperative AFP level and vascular invasion were found to be significantly associated with PET+ (P = 0.003 and P < 0.001, respectively). However, the association between histological grade and PET+ findings did not reach statistical significant difference (P = 0.074). Moreover, the 2-year recurrence-free survival rate of PET- patients was significantly higher than that of PET+ patients (85.1% vs. 46.1%) (P = 0.0005). Of 6 PET+ patients who met the Milan criteria, 4 patients (66.7%) had recurrence, but all 20 PET- patients who met the Milan criteria were recurrence free. Thus, PET imaging could be a good preoperative tool for estimating the post-LT risk of tumor recurrence, because histological grade and vascular invasion cannot be determined preoperatively. Importantly, our results indicate that tumor recurrence can be highly anticipated for PET-imaging-positive HCC patients who satisfy the Milan criteria. We advise that PET+ HCC patients be selected cautiously for LT. (c) 2006 AASLD

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16964589     DOI: 10.1002/lt.20861

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Liver Transpl        ISSN: 1527-6465            Impact factor:   5.799


  42 in total

1.  18F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT predicts tumour progression after transarterial chemoembolization in hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Myeong Jun Song; Si Hyun Bae; Sung Won Lee; Do Sun Song; Hee Yeon Kim; Ie Ryung Yoo; Joon-Il Choi; Young June Lee; Ho Jong Chun; Hae Giu Lee; Jong Young Choi; Seung Kew Yoon
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2013-02-22       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Prognostic value of (18)F-FDG PET/CT in liver transplantation for hepatocarcinoma.

Authors:  Olivier Detry; Laurence Govaerts; Arnaud Deroover; Morgan Vandermeulen; Nicolas Meurisse; Serge Malenga; Noella Bletard; Charles Mbendi; Anne Lamproye; Pierre Honoré; Paul Meunier; Jean Delwaide; Roland Hustinx
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-03-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 3.  Functional imaging of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Tim Ch Hoogenboom; Mark Thursz; Eric O Aboagye; Rohini Sharma
Journal:  Hepat Oncol       Date:  2016-03-29

Review 4.  Prediction of hepatocellular carcinoma biological behavior in patient selection for liver transplantation.

Authors:  Umberto Cillo; Tommaso Giuliani; Marina Polacco; Luz Maria Herrero Manley; Gino Crivellari; Alessandro Vitale
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  2014 Korean Liver Cancer Study Group-National Cancer Center Korea practice guideline for the management of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors: 
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2015-05-13       Impact factor: 3.500

Review 6.  The emerging role of positron emission tomography in hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Suraiya R Dubash; Oluwagbemiga A Idowu; Rohini Sharma
Journal:  Hepat Oncol       Date:  2015-04-27

Review 7.  Liver transplantation for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: how far can we go?

Authors:  Kyung-Suk Suh; Hae Won Lee
Journal:  Hepat Oncol       Date:  2015-01-12

8.  Diagnostic value for extrahepatic metastases of hepatocellular carcinoma in positron emission tomography/computed tomography scan.

Authors:  Ji Eun Lee; Jae Young Jang; Soung Won Jeong; Sae Hwan Lee; Sang Gyune Kim; Sang-Woo Cha; Young Seok Kim; Young Deok Cho; Hong Soo Kim; Boo Sung Kim; So Young Jin; Deuk Lin Choi
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-06-21       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  2014 KLCSG-NCC Korea Practice Guideline for the Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Authors: 
Journal:  Gut Liver       Date:  2015-05-23       Impact factor: 4.519

10.  Kinetic analysis of FDG in rat liver: effect of dietary intervention on arterial and portal vein input.

Authors:  Sudheer D Rani; Samuel T Nemanich; Nicole Fettig; Kooresh I Shoghi
Journal:  Nucl Med Biol       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 2.408

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.