Literature DB >> 16964497

Network metrics reveal differences in social organization between two fission-fusion species, Grevy's zebra and onager.

Siva R Sundaresan1, Ilya R Fischhoff, Jonathan Dushoff, Daniel I Rubenstein.   

Abstract

For species in which group membership frequently changes, it has been a challenge to characterize variation in individual interactions and social structure. Quantifying this variation is necessary to test hypotheses about ecological determinants of social patterns and to make predictions about how group dynamics affect the development of cooperative relationships and transmission processes. Network models have recently become popular for analyzing individual contacts within a population context. We use network metrics to compare populations of Grevy's zebra (Equus grevyi) and onagers (Equus hemionus khur). These closely related equids, previously described as having the same social system, inhabit environments differing in the distribution of food, water, and predators. Grevy's zebra and onagers are one example of many sets of coarsely similar fission-fusion species and populations, observed elsewhere in other ungulates, primates, and cetaceans. Our analysis of the population association networks reveals contrasts consistent with their distinctive environments. Grevy's zebra individuals are more selective in their association choices. Grevy's zebra form stable cliques, while onager associations are more fluid. We find evidence that females associate assortatively by reproductive state in Grevy's zebra but not in onagers. The current approach demonstrates the utility of network metrics for identifying fine-grained variation among individuals and populations in association patterns. From our analysis, we can make testable predictions about behavioral mechanisms underlying social structure and its effects on transmission processes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16964497     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-006-0553-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  12 in total

1.  Scaling in animal group-size distributions.

Authors:  E Bonabeau; L Dagorn; P Fréon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-04-13       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Matriarchs as repositories of social knowledge in African elephants.

Authors:  K McComb; C Moss; S M Durant; L Baker; S Sayialel
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-04-20       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  The emergent properties of a dolphin social network.

Authors:  David Lusseau
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-11-07       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Assortative interactions and social networks in fish.

Authors:  D P Croft; R James; A J W Ward; M S Botham; D Mawdsley; J Krause
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2005-01-29       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Identifying the role that animals play in their social networks.

Authors:  David Lusseau; M E J Newman
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-12-07       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 6.  Networks and epidemic models.

Authors:  Matt J Keeling; Ken T D Eames
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2005-09-22       Impact factor: 4.118

7.  Behavior predicts genes structure in a wild primate group.

Authors:  J Altmann; S C Alberts; S A Haines; J Dubach; P Muruthi; T Coote; E Geffen; D J Cheesman; R S Mututua; S N Saiyalel; R K Wayne; R C Lacy; M W Bruford
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-06-11       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  A method for testing association patterns of social animals.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 2.844

9.  Observations on social organization and behaviour of African and Asiatic wild asses (Equus africanus and E. hemionus).

Authors:  H Klingel
Journal:  Z Tierpsychol       Date:  1977-07

10.  Social networks in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata).

Authors:  Darren P Croft; Jens Krause; Richard James
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-12-07       Impact factor: 5.349

View more
  43 in total

1.  Disease transmission in territorial populations: the small-world network of Serengeti lions.

Authors:  Meggan E Craft; Erik Volz; Craig Packer; Lauren Ancel Meyers
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  The effect of individual variation on the structure and function of interaction networks in harvester ants.

Authors:  Noa Pinter-Wollman; Roy Wollman; Adam Guetz; Susan Holmes; Deborah M Gordon
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 4.118

3.  A test of the social cohesion hypothesis: interactive female marmots remain at home.

Authors:  Daniel T Blumstein; Tina W Wey; Karisa Tang
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-06-03       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 4.  Recent advances in the analysis of behavioural organization and interpretation as indicators of animal welfare.

Authors:  Lucy Asher; Lisa M Collins; Angel Ortiz-Pelaez; Julian A Drewe; Christine J Nicol; Dirk U Pfeiffer
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2009-09-09       Impact factor: 4.118

5.  Evolutionary dynamics on any population structure.

Authors:  Benjamin Allen; Gabor Lippner; Yu-Ting Chen; Babak Fotouhi; Naghmeh Momeni; Shing-Tung Yau; Martin A Nowak
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2017-03-29       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  The ecology of movement and behaviour: a saturated tripartite network for describing animal contacts.

Authors:  Kezia Manlove; Christina Aiello; Pratha Sah; Bree Cummins; Peter J Hudson; Paul C Cross
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Topological effects of network structure on long-term social network dynamics in a wild mammal.

Authors:  Amiyaal Ilany; Andrew S Booms; Kay E Holekamp
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2015-05-14       Impact factor: 9.492

Review 8.  Physiology modulates social flexibility and collective behaviour in equids and other large ungulates.

Authors:  Andrew S Gersick; Daniel I Rubenstein
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-08-19       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  Social networks in the lek-mating wire-tailed manakin (Pipra filicauda).

Authors:  Thomas B Ryder; David B McDonald; John G Blake; Patricia G Parker; Bette A Loiselle
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-06-22       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Cooperators Unite! Assortative linking promotes cooperation particularly for medium sized associations.

Authors:  Adám Kun; Gergely Boza; István Scheuring
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2010-06-11       Impact factor: 3.260

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.