Literature DB >> 16963730

Surgical mortality in patients with esophageal cancer: development and validation of a simple risk score.

Ewout W Steyerberg1, Bridget A Neville, Linetta B Koppert, Valery E P P Lemmens, Hugo W Tilanus, Jan-Willem W Coebergh, Jane C Weeks, Craig C Earle.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Surgery has curative potential in a proportion of patients with esophageal cancer, but is associated with considerable perioperative risks. We aimed to develop and validate a simple risk score for surgical mortality that could be applied to administrative data. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analyzed 3,592 esophagectomy patients from four cohorts. We applied logistic regression analysis to predict mortality occurring within 30 days after esophagectomy for 1,327 esophageal cancer patients older than 65 years of age, diagnosed between 1991 and 1996 in the linked Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER)--Medicare database. A simple score chart for preoperative risk assessment of surgical mortality was developed and validated on three other cohorts, including 714 SEER-Medicare patients diagnosed between 1997 and 1999, 349 patients from a population-based registry in the Netherlands diagnosed between 1993 and 2001, and 1,202 patients from a referral hospital in the Netherlands diagnosed between 1980 and 2002.
RESULTS: Surgical mortality in the four cohorts was 11% (147 of 1,327), 10% (74 of 714), 7% (25 of 349), and 4% (45 of 1,202), respectively. Predictive patient characteristics included age, comorbidity (cardiac, pulmonary, renal, hepatic, and diabetes), preoperative radiotherapy or combined chemoradiotherapy, and a relatively low hospital volume. At validation, the simple score showed good agreement of predicted risks with observed mortality rates (calibration), but low discrimination (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.58 to 0.66).
CONCLUSION: A simple risk score combining clinical characteristics along with hospital volume to predict surgical mortality after esophagectomy from administrative data may form a basis for risk adjustment in quality of care assessment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16963730     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.05.0658

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  52 in total

1.  Patient Selection for Oesophagectomy: Impact of Age and Comorbidities on Outcome.

Authors:  Gregory O'Grady; Ahmer M Hameed; Tony C Pang; Emma Johnston; Vincent T Lam; Arthur J Richardson; Michael J Hollands
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Novel Calculator to Estimate Overall Survival Benefit from Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation in Patients with Esophageal Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Emmanuel Gabriel; Kristopher Attwood; Rupen Shah; Steven Nurkin; Steven Hochwald; Moshim Kukar
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2017-01-29       Impact factor: 6.113

3.  Risk prediction scores for postoperative mortality after esophagectomy: validation of different models.

Authors:  U Zingg; C Langton; B Addison; B P L Wijnhoven; J Forberger; S K Thompson; A J Esterman; D I Watson
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2008-12-03       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Mortality rate associated with 56 consecutive esophagectomies performed at a "low-volume" hospital: is procedure volume as important as we are trying to make it?

Authors:  Brian Santin; Aaron Kulwicki; Phillip Price
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2008-06-10       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Evaluation of record linkage between a large healthcare provider and the Utah Population Database.

Authors:  Scott L DuVall; Alison M Fraser; Kerry Rowe; Alun Thomas; Geraldine P Mineau
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2011-09-16       Impact factor: 4.497

6.  The use of correlation functions in thoracic surgery research.

Authors:  Lucile Gust; Xavier Benoit D'journo
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 2.895

7.  Efficacy and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection in elderly patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Byeong Geun Song; Yang Won Min; Jun Haeng Lee; Hyuk Lee; Byung-Hoon Min; Poong-Lyul Rhee; Jae J Kim
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-03-24       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  [Economic aspects of oncological esophageal surgery : Centralization is essential].

Authors:  N von Dercks; I Gockel; M Mehdorn; D Lorenz
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 9.  Esophageal cancer: The latest on chemoprevention and state of the art therapies.

Authors:  Gregoire F Le Bras; Muhammad H Farooq; Gary W Falk; Claudia D Andl
Journal:  Pharmacol Res       Date:  2016-08-24       Impact factor: 7.658

Review 10.  Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer: a review of meta-analyses.

Authors:  Bas P L Wijnhoven; Jan J B van Lanschot; Hugo W Tilanus; Ewout W Steyerberg; Ate van der Gaast
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.352

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.