STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine if obesity-related changes in lung volume might contribute to airway reactivity, we investigated the effects of simulated mild obesity-related lung volume reductions on airway responsiveness in lean, nonasthmatic subjects. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: We simulated the lung volume reductions of class 1 obesity in eight lean, nonasthmatic subjects by externally mass loading the chest wall and abdomen, and shifting blood volume into the lung with lower limb compression (LLC). Airway responsiveness was assessed by measuring FEV(1) before and after methacholine challenge tests (1, 2.5, 5, 10, and 25 mg/mL) with the following: (1) no intervention (control); (2) external chest loading (CL); (3) LLC; and (4) CL and LLC (COMB) on separate days. Lung function was measured before and after CL, LLC, and COMB were applied. RESULTS: The application of CL, LLC, and COMB decreased expiratory reserve volume, functional residual capacity, and total lung capacity compared with baseline. FVC and FEV(1) decreased significantly with CL and COMB, while FEV(1)/FVC did not change compared to baseline. The maximal response to the methacholine challenge increased with CL, LLC, and COMB, with a mean maximal fall of FEV(1) of 9%, 11%, and 18%, respectively, compared to a 6% fall with control. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that decreases in lung volume increase airway responsiveness and may account for the increased propensity for increased airway responsiveness in the obese.
STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine if obesity-related changes in lung volume might contribute to airway reactivity, we investigated the effects of simulated mild obesity-related lung volume reductions on airway responsiveness in lean, nonasthmatic subjects. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: We simulated the lung volume reductions of class 1 obesity in eight lean, nonasthmatic subjects by externally mass loading the chest wall and abdomen, and shifting blood volume into the lung with lower limb compression (LLC). Airway responsiveness was assessed by measuring FEV(1) before and after methacholine challenge tests (1, 2.5, 5, 10, and 25 mg/mL) with the following: (1) no intervention (control); (2) external chest loading (CL); (3) LLC; and (4) CL and LLC (COMB) on separate days. Lung function was measured before and after CL, LLC, and COMB were applied. RESULTS: The application of CL, LLC, and COMB decreased expiratory reserve volume, functional residual capacity, and total lung capacity compared with baseline. FVC and FEV(1) decreased significantly with CL and COMB, while FEV(1)/FVC did not change compared to baseline. The maximal response to the methacholine challenge increased with CL, LLC, and COMB, with a mean maximal fall of FEV(1) of 9%, 11%, and 18%, respectively, compared to a 6% fall with control. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that decreases in lung volume increase airway responsiveness and may account for the increased propensity for increased airway responsiveness in the obese.
Authors: A Sood; C Qualls; R Li; M Schuyler; W S Beckett; L J Smith; B Thyagarajan; C E Lewis; D R Jacobs Journal: Eur Respir J Date: 2010-06-04 Impact factor: 16.671
Authors: Louis-Philippe Boulet; Qutayba Hamid; Simon L Bacon; Céline Bergeron; Louis-Philippe Boulet; Yue Chen; Anne E Dixon; Pierre Ernst; Qutayba Hamid; Fernando Holguin; Charles G Irvin; R John Kimoff; Sushma Komakula; Catherine Laprise; Kim L Lavoie; Stephanie A Shore; Mihaela Teodorescu; Marie-Claude Vohl Journal: Can Respir J Date: 2007 May-Jun Impact factor: 2.409
Authors: Daniel P Wilhite; Dharini M Bhammar; Bryce N Balmain; Tanya Martinez-Fernandez; Tony G Babb Journal: Respir Physiol Neurobiol Date: 2020-12-07 Impact factor: 1.931