Literature DB >> 16963346

Portion distortion: typical portion sizes selected by young adults.

Jaime Schwartz1, Carol Byrd-Bredbenner.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The incidence of obesity has increased in parallel with increasing portion sizes of individually packaged and ready-to-eat prepared foods as well as foods served at restaurants. Portion distortion (perceiving large portion sizes as appropriate amounts to eat at a single eating occasion) may contribute to increasing energy intakes and expanding waistlines. The purpose of this study was to determine typical portion sizes that young adults select, how typical portion sizes compare with reference portion sizes (based in this study on the Nutrition Labeling and Education Act's quantities of food customarily eaten per eating occasion), and whether the size of typical portions has changed over time.
SUBJECTS: Young adults (n=177, 75% female, age range 16 to 26 years) at a major northeastern university.
METHODS: Participants served themselves typical portion sizes of eight foods at breakfast (n=63) or six foods at lunch or dinner (n=62, n=52, respectively). Typical portion-size selections were unobtrusively weighed. A unit score was calculated by awarding 1 point for each food with a typical portion size that was within 25% larger or smaller than the reference portion; larger or smaller portions were given 0 points. Thus, each participant's unit score could range from 0 to 8 at breakfast or 0 to 6 at lunch and dinner. Analysis of variance or t tests were used to determine whether typical and reference portion sizes differed, and whether typical portion sizes changed over time.
RESULTS: Mean unit scores (+/-standard deviation) were 3.63+/-1.27 and 1.89+/-1.14, for breakfast and lunch/dinner, respectively, indicating little agreement between typical and reference portion sizes. Typical portions sizes in this study tended to be significantly different from those selected by young adults in a similar study conducted 2 decades ago.
CONCLUSIONS: Portion distortion seems to affect the portion sizes selected by young adults for some foods. This phenomenon has the potential to hinder weight loss, weight maintenance, and/or health improvement efforts. Thus, to ensure more effective nutrition counseling, food and nutrition professionals must develop ways to "undistort" what clients perceive to be typical portion sizes and help them recognize what is an appropriate amount to eat at a single eating occasion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16963346     DOI: 10.1016/j.jada.2006.06.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Diet Assoc        ISSN: 0002-8223


  29 in total

Review 1.  Weight-Related Dietary Behaviors in Young Adults.

Authors:  Margaret Allman-Farinelli; Stephanie R Partridge; Rajshri Roy
Journal:  Curr Obes Rep       Date:  2016-03

2.  Perceived 'healthiness' of foods can influence consumers' estimations of energy density and appropriate portion size.

Authors:  G P Faulkner; L K Pourshahidi; J M W Wallace; M A Kerr; T A McCaffrey; M B E Livingstone
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2013-05-07       Impact factor: 5.095

3.  Candy consumption patterns, effects on health, and behavioral strategies to promote moderation: summary report of a roundtable discussion.

Authors:  Roberta L Duyff; Leann L Birch; Carol Byrd-Bredbenner; Susan L Johnson; Richard D Mattes; Mary M Murphy; Theresa A Nicklas; Brandi Y Rollins; Brian Wansink
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2015-01-15       Impact factor: 8.701

4.  Portion size: review and framework for interventions.

Authors:  Ingrid Hm Steenhuis; Willemijn M Vermeer
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2009-08-21       Impact factor: 6.457

Review 5.  Modifiable risk factors in relation to changes in BMI and fatness: what have we learned from prospective studies of school-aged children?

Authors:  A Must; E E Barish; L G Bandini
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2009-04-28       Impact factor: 5.095

6.  Using plate mapping to examine sensitivity to plate size in food portions and meal composition among college students.

Authors:  David Sharp; Jeffery Sobal
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2012-08-04       Impact factor: 3.868

7.  Development of the Iowa bone nutrient food frequency questionnaire based on data from the US Department of Agriculture Continuing Survey of the Food Intake by Individuals.

Authors:  Julie M E Gilmore; Teresa A Marshall; Steven M Levy; Phyllis J Stumbo
Journal:  J Food Compost Anal       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 4.556

Review 8.  Impact of Portion Control Tools on Portion Size Awareness, Choice and Intake: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  M Angeles Vargas-Alvarez; Santiago Navas-Carretero; Luigi Palla; J Alfredo Martínez; Eva Almiron-Roig
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 5.717

9.  How much should I eat? A comparison of suggested portion sizes in the UK.

Authors:  Hannah B Lewis; Amy L Ahern; Susan A Jebb
Journal:  Public Health Nutr       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 4.022

Review 10.  Does food marketing need to make us fat? A review and solutions.

Authors:  Pierre Chandon; Brian Wansink
Journal:  Nutr Rev       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 6.846

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.