Literature DB >> 16963282

How metaphors influence semantic relatedness judgments: the role of the right frontal cortex.

Argyris K Stringaris1, Nicholas Medford, Rachel Giora, Vincent C Giampietro, Michael J Brammer, Anthony S David.   

Abstract

We used event-related fMRI (ER-fMRI) to test the hypothesis that metaphors bias cognitive processing of semantic relatedness towards a search for a wider range of associations. Twelve right-handed male volunteers read a mixture of metaphoric and literal sentences, each sentence being followed by a single word, which could be semantically related or not to the preceding sentence context. We found that judging unrelated words as contextually irrelevant was associated with increased blood oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD) signal in the right ventrolateral prefrontal cortex in the metaphoric but not in the literal condition. The same region was also activated when subjects endorsed a semantic relation between words and metaphoric sentence primes but not between words and literal sentence primes. We argue that these results are consistent with the notion of semantic open-endedness, whereby figurative statements bias cognitive processing towards a search for a wider range of semantic relationships compared to literal statements, and thus lend further support to the view that coarse semantic coding occurs preferentially in the right hemisphere.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16963282     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.06.057

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  23 in total

1.  The origins of insight in resting-state brain activity.

Authors:  John Kounios; Jessica I Fleck; Deborah L Green; Lisa Payne; Jennifer L Stevenson; Edward M Bowden; Mark Jung-Beeman
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2007-07-27       Impact factor: 3.139

2.  Do nonnative language speakers chew the fat and spill the beans with different brain hemispheres? Investigating idiom decomposability with the divided visual field paradigm.

Authors:  Anna B Cieślicka
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2013-12

3.  The role of the right hemisphere in metaphor comprehension: a meta-analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging studies.

Authors:  Jie Yang
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-08-30       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  The influence of context on hemispheric recruitment during metaphor processing.

Authors:  Michele T Diaz; Larson J Hogstrom
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2011-05-13       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  An fMRI investigation of analogical mapping in metaphor comprehension: the influence of context and individual cognitive capacities on processing demands.

Authors:  Chantel S Prat; Robert A Mason; Marcel Adam Just
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2011-11-28       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  The influence of sentence novelty and figurativeness on brain activity.

Authors:  Michele T Diaz; Kyle T Barrett; Larson J Hogstrom
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2010-12-10       Impact factor: 3.139

7.  The role of left and right hemispheres in the comprehension of idiomatic language: an electrical neuroimaging study.

Authors:  Alice M Proverbio; Nicola Crotti; Alberto Zani; Roberta Adorni
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2009-09-15       Impact factor: 3.288

8.  Differential associations of early- and late-night sleep with functional brain states promoting insight to abstract task regularity.

Authors:  Juliana Yordanova; Vasil Kolev; Ullrich Wagner; Rolf Verleger
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-02-26       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Functional-anatomical organization of predicate metaphor processing.

Authors:  Evan Chen; Page Widick; Anjan Chatterjee
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2008-08-09       Impact factor: 2.381

Review 10.  Beyond laterality: a critical assessment of research on the neural basis of metaphor.

Authors:  Gwenda L Schmidt; Alexander Kranjec; Eileen R Cardillo; Anjan Chatterjee
Journal:  J Int Neuropsychol Soc       Date:  2009-09-21       Impact factor: 2.892

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.