Literature DB >> 16963279

Simulation analysis of interference EMG during fatiguing voluntary contractions. Part I: What do the intramuscular spike amplitude-frequency histograms reflect?

G V Dimitrov1, T I Arabadzhiev, J-Y Hogrel, N A Dimitrova.   

Abstract

Decline in amplitude of EMG signals and in the rate of counts of intramuscularly recorded spikes during fatigue is often attributed to a progressive reduction of the neural drive only. As a rule, alterations in intracellular action potential (IAP) are not taken into account. To test correctness of the hypothesis, the effect of various discharge frequency patterns as well as changes in IAP shape and muscle fibre propagation velocity (MFPV) on the spike amplitude-frequency histogram of intramuscular interference EMG signals were simulated and analyzed. It was assumed that muscle was composed of four types of motor units (MUs): slow-twitch fatigue resistant, fast-twitch fatigue resistant, fast intermediate, and fast fatigable. MFPV and IAP duration at initial stage before fatigue as well as their changes differed for individual MU types. Fatigability of individual MU types in normal conditions as well as in the case of ischaemic or low oxygen conditions due to restricted blood flow was also taken into account. It was found that spike amplitude-frequency histogram is poorly sensitive to MU firing frequency, while it is highly sensitive to IAP profile lengthening. It is concluded that spike amplitude-frequency analysis can hardly provide a correct measure of MU rate-coding pattern during fatigue.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16963279     DOI: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2006.06.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol        ISSN: 1050-6411            Impact factor:   2.368


  2 in total

1.  A muscle architecture model offering control over motor unit fiber density distributions.

Authors:  Javier Navallas; Armando Malanda; Luis Gila; Javier Rodríguez; Ignacio Rodríguez
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Comparative evaluation of motor unit architecture models.

Authors:  Javier Navallas; Armando Malanda; Luis Gila; Javier Rodriguez; Ignacio Rodriguez
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2009-08-25       Impact factor: 2.602

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.