Literature DB >> 16963194

Women's perceptions and social barriers determine compliance to cervical screening: results from a population based study in India.

Partha Basu1, Srabanti Sarkar, Supriya Mukherjee, Mousumi Ghoshal, Srabani Mittal, Sutapa Biswas, Ranajit Mandal, Rengaswamy Sankaranarayanan.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Success of cervical screening initiatives depends on high participation of the target population, which in turn is determined by the women's perceptions, health orientation and other socio-cultural issues. The present study identifies the immediate social and cultural barriers that prevent women to attend cervical screening facilities.
METHODS: Women non-compliant to a community-based cervical screening program were identified. From them 500 were randomly selected for interview using a structured questionnaire that was designed on the basis of feedbacks received from several focused group discussions. Questionnaire listed 24 possible reasons for non-compliance. The women were asked to select the most pertinent reason(s) for her non-attendance or to reveal if they had any reason other than the listed ones.
RESULTS: A total of 469 non-compliant women were interviewed. They had significantly lower literacy rate compared to the compliant women (OR=2.25; 95% CI: 1.23-4.13). Nearly half of the interviewed women responded that they themselves opted to stay away from the program. Most common reasons cited for non-attendance in this group were reluctance to go for medical test in the absence of any symptoms and apprehension to have a test that detects cancer. Second major group of responders comprised of women who were willing, yet could not attend due to various hurdles. Most common hurdles were inability to leave household chores, pre-occupation with family problems and lack of approval from husbands.
CONCLUSIONS: Modification of health behavior through education and social empowerment of women are essential for a population based cervical screening program to succeed in India.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16963194     DOI: 10.1016/j.cdp.2006.07.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Detect Prev        ISSN: 0361-090X


  26 in total

1.  Perception and risk factors for cervical cancer among women in northern Ghana.

Authors:  Constance A Opoku; Edmund Nii Laryea Browne; Kathryn Spangenberg; Cheryl Moyer; David Kolbilla; Katherine J Gold
Journal:  Ghana Med J       Date:  2016-06

2.  Perceptions of risk and barriers to cervical cancer screening at Moi Teaching and Referral Hospital (MTRH), Eldoret, Kenya.

Authors:  E Were; Z Nyaberi; N Buziba
Journal:  Afr Health Sci       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 0.927

3.  Better cancer screening in resource-poor nations.

Authors:  Emily Sohn
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Detection and genotyping of HPV in urine samples from Chilean women attending primary health care centers.

Authors:  Nicolás Vergara; Monserrat Balanda; Wilma Hidalgo; Héctor San Martín; Alexis Aceituno; Francisco Roldán; Tania Villalón; Melissa Hott; Gloria Espinoza; Andrea Quiero; María T Valenzuela; Eugenio Ramírez
Journal:  Med Microbiol Immunol       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  Knowledge and acceptability of human papillomavirus vaccination and cervical cancer screening among women in Karnataka, India.

Authors:  Martha P Montgomery; Tanaka Dune; Prasanna K Shetty; Avinash K Shetty
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 2.037

6.  Cervical cancer control: deaf and hearing women's response to an educational video.

Authors:  Catherine S Yao; Erin L Merz; Melanie Nakaji; Kadie M Harry; Vanessa L Malcarne; Georgia Robins Sadler
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.037

Review 7.  The challenges of implementing low-dose computed tomography for lung cancer screening in low- and middle-income countries.

Authors:  Eduardo Edelman Saul; Raquel B Guerra; Michelle Edelman Saul; Laercio Lopes da Silva; Gabriel F P Aleixo; Raquel M K Matuda; Gilberto Lopes
Journal:  Nat Cancer       Date:  2020-11-30

8.  Acceptability of HPV vaccine implementation among parents in India.

Authors:  Proma Paul; Amanda E Tanner; Patti E Gravitt; K Vijayaraghavan; Keerti V Shah; Gregory D Zimet; Catch Study Group
Journal:  Health Care Women Int       Date:  2013-04-23

9.  Effectiveness of VIA, Pap, and HPV DNA testing in a cervical cancer screening program in a peri-urban community in Andhra Pradesh, India.

Authors:  Patti E Gravitt; Proma Paul; Hormuzd A Katki; Haripriya Vendantham; Gayatri Ramakrishna; Mrudula Sudula; Basany Kalpana; Brigitte M Ronnett; K Vijayaraghavan; Keerti V Shah
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The impact of cervical cancer education for deaf women using a video educational tool employing American sign language, open captioning, and graphics.

Authors:  Sun Choe; Rod Seung-Hwan Lim; Karen Clark; Regina Wang; Patricia Branz; Georgia Robins Sadler
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.037

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.