Literature DB >> 16962752

The effects of capture spiral composition and orb-web orientation on prey interception.

Brent D Opell1, Jason E Bond, Daniel A Warner.   

Abstract

Cribellar prey capture threads found in primitive, horizontal orb-webs reflect more light, including ultraviolet wavelengths, than viscous threads found in more derived, vertical orb-webs. Low web visibility and vertical orientation are each thought to increase prey interception and may represent key innovations that contributed to the greater diversity of modern, araneoid orb-weaving spiders. This study compares prey interception rates of cribellate orb-webs constructed by Uloborus glomosus (Uloboridae) with viscous orb-webs constructed by Leucauge venusta (Tetragnathidae) and Micrathena gracilis (Araneidae). We placed sectors of cribellar and viscous threads side by side in frames that were oriented either horizontally or vertically. The webs of both U. glomosus and L. venusta intercepted more prey when vertically oriented. In each orientation L. venusta webs intercepted more insects than did U. glomosus. Although this is consistent with the greater visibility of cribellar threads, the more closely spaced capture spirals of L. venusta may have contributed to this difference. Micrathena gracilis webs intercepted more prey than did U. glomosus webs, although web orientation did not affect the performance of this araneoid species. The stickier and more closely spaced capture spirals of M. gracilis may have enhanced the interception rates of this species and accounted for the greater number of smaller dipterans retained in its webs. The tendency for these slow, weak flight insects to be blown into both horizontal and vertical webs may account for similar interception rates of horizontal and vertical M. gracilis webs. These observations support the enhanced prey interception of vertically oriented orb-webs, but offer only qualified support for the contributions of lower visibility viscous capture threads.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16962752     DOI: 10.1016/j.zool.2006.04.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Zoology (Jena)        ISSN: 0944-2006            Impact factor:   2.240


  7 in total

Review 1.  High-performance spider webs: integrating biomechanics, ecology and behaviour.

Authors:  Aaron M T Harmer; Todd A Blackledge; Joshua S Madin; Marie E Herberstein
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2010-10-29       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  Functionally independent components of prey capture are architecturally constrained in spider orb webs.

Authors:  Todd A Blackledge; Chad M Eliason
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2007-10-22       Impact factor: 3.703

3.  Reconstructing web evolution and spider diversification in the molecular era.

Authors:  Todd A Blackledge; Nikolaj Scharff; Jonathan A Coddington; Tamas Szüts; John W Wenzel; Cheryl Y Hayashi; Ingi Agnarsson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-03-16       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Jewelled spiders manipulate colour-lure geometry to deceive prey.

Authors:  Thomas E White
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 3.703

5.  Bioprospecting finds the toughest biological material: extraordinary silk from a giant riverine orb spider.

Authors:  Ingi Agnarsson; Matjaz Kuntner; Todd A Blackledge
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-09-16       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  The Effect of Wind Exposure on the Web Characteristics of a Tetragnathid Orb Spider.

Authors:  Nicholas Tew; Thomas Hesselberg
Journal:  J Insect Behav       Date:  2017-05-18       Impact factor: 1.309

7.  Caught in the web: Spider web architecture affects prey specialization and spider-prey stoichiometric relationships.

Authors:  Lorraine Ludwig; Matthew A Barbour; Jennifer Guevara; Leticia Avilés; Angélica L González
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 2.912

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.