Literature DB >> 16961961

Monge: The Verriest lecture, Lyon, July 2005.

John Mollon1.   

Abstract

In 1789, when neither the physical basis of hue nor the retinal basis of color perception was established, the mathematician Gaspard Monte stated firmly that our color perceptions do not depend on the absolute value of the physical variable, but are influenced by the context and in particular by our estimate of the illuminant. He used this insight to explain color contrast effects and the Paradox of Monge (the desaturation of red objects seen through a red filter). He proposed that we can estimate the chromaticity of the illuminant in any scene because all surfaces reflect to us varying mixtures of (i) the body color and (ii) a specular component that represents the illuminant. He also realized that white objects have a special property: Provided that they are illuminated by a single illuminant, such objects exhibit no variation in chromaticity across their surface. Thus at least one of the unique hues exists as an external reference on which observers can agree. It is suggested that other unique hues may also have a basis in the external world.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16961961     DOI: 10.1017/S0952523806233479

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vis Neurosci        ISSN: 0952-5238            Impact factor:   3.241


  36 in total

1.  What is white?

Authors:  J M Bosten; R D Beer; D I A MacLeod
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Variations in normal color vision. VII. Relationships between color naming and hue scaling.

Authors:  Kara J Emery; Vicki J Volbrecht; David H Peterzell; Michael A Webster
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Asymmetries in blue-yellow color perception and in the color of 'the dress'.

Authors:  Alissa D Winkler; Lothar Spillmann; John S Werner; Michael A Webster
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2015-05-14       Impact factor: 10.834

4.  Salience of unique hues and implications for color theory.

Authors:  Lauren E Wool; Stanley J Komban; Jens Kremkow; Michael Jansen; Xiaobing Li; Jose-Manuel Alonso; Qasim Zaidi
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015-02-06       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Adjusting to a sudden “aging” of the lens.

Authors:  Katherine E M Tregillus; John S Werner; Michael A Webster
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 2.129

6.  The achromatic locus: effect of navigation direction in color space.

Authors:  Tushar Chauhan; Esther Perales; Kaida Xiao; Emily Hird; Dimosthenis Karatzas; Sophie Wuerger
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-01-24       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Learning to integrate contradictory multisensory self-motion cue pairings.

Authors:  Mariia Kaliuzhna; Mario Prsa; Steven Gale; Stella J Lee; Olaf Blanke
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015-01-14       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  Superior discrimination for hue than for saturation and an explanation in terms of correlated neural noise.

Authors:  M V Danilova; J D Mollon
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-05-25       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Individual and age-related variation in chromatic contrast adaptation.

Authors:  Sarah L Elliott; John S Werner; Michael A Webster
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-08-17       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 10.  The Verriest Lecture: Short-wave-sensitive cone pathways across the life span.

Authors:  John S Werner
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 2.129

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.