Literature DB >> 16961669

Cognitive-behavioural stress management does not improve biological cardiovascular risk indicators in women with ischaemic heart disease: a randomized-controlled trial.

M Claesson1, L S Birgander, J-H Jansson, B Lindahl, G Burell, K Asplund, C Mattsson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Psychosocial factors, such as stress and vital exhaustion, are associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular events, and women report more psychosocial ill-being after an acute myocardial infarction than men. We have earlier shown that a cognitive-behavioural intervention in women with ischaemic heart disease (IHD) improved psychosocial well-being. In the present study, we tested the hypothesis that the improvement in psychosocial well-being is associated with an improvement in biochemical indicators of cardiovascular risk.
DESIGN: Randomized-controlled trial in northern Sweden.
SETTING: Outpatient care.
SUBJECTS: Women with IHD were randomized to either a 1-year cognitive-behavioural stress management programme or usual care. Of the 159 women who completed the study, 77 were in the intervention group, and 82 in the control group.
INTERVENTIONS: A 1-year cognitive-behavioural stress management programme versus conventional care.
RESULTS: Group assignment was not found to be a determinant of waist circumference, high sensitive C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), fibrinogen, von Willebrand factor (vWF), plasminogen activator inhibitor type 1 (PAI-1) activity, tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) activity, tPA antigen, tPA-PAI-1 complex, leptin, or HOMA2 insulin resistance index (HOMA2-IR) at follow up. Changes in psychosocial variables were not associated with changes in any of the biological risk indicators.
CONCLUSIONS: Even if our cognitive-behavioural stress management programme had effects on proximal targets, such as stress behaviour and vital exhaustion, we found no improvement in intermediate biochemical targets related to the metabolic syndrome and IHD. Our results challenge the proposition that the relationship between psychological well-being and biological cardiovascular risk indicators is a direct cause-effect phenomenon.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16961669     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2006.01691.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Intern Med        ISSN: 0954-6820            Impact factor:   8.989


  6 in total

1.  Psychosocial Interventions and Immune System Function: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Grant S Shields; Chandler M Spahr; George M Slavich
Journal:  JAMA Psychiatry       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 21.596

Review 2.  Psychological interventions for coronary heart disease.

Authors:  Suzanne H Richards; Lindsey Anderson; Caroline E Jenkinson; Ben Whalley; Karen Rees; Philippa Davies; Paul Bennett; Zulian Liu; Robert West; David R Thompson; Rod S Taylor
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-04-28

3.  Mind-Body Medicine and Immune System Outcomes: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Helané Wahbeh; Ashley Haywood; Karen Kaufman; Heather Zwickey
Journal:  Open Complement Med J       Date:  2009

4.  Design of the study: how can health care help female breast cancer patients reduce their stress symptoms? A randomized intervention study with stepped-care.

Authors:  Karin Nordin; Ritva Rissanen; Johan Ahlgren; Gunilla Burell; Marie-Louise Fjällskog; Susanne Börjesson; Cecilia Arving
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2012-05-04       Impact factor: 4.430

Review 5.  Comparative Effectiveness of the Core Components of Cardiac Rehabilitation on Mortality and Morbidity: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Nader N Kabboul; George Tomlinson; Troy A Francis; Sherry L Grace; Gabriela Chaves; Valeria Rac; Tamara Daou-Kabboul; Joanna M Bielecki; David A Alter; Murray Krahn
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 4.241

6.  The effect of group-based cognitive behavioral therapy on inflammatory biomarkers in patients with coronary heart disease-results from the SUPRIM-trial.

Authors:  Erik M G Olsson; Fredrika Norlund; Ronnie Pingel; Gunilla Burell; Mats Gulliksson; Anders Larsson; Bo Karlsson; Kurt Svärdsudd; Claes Held
Journal:  Ups J Med Sci       Date:  2018-08-08       Impact factor: 2.384

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.