Literature DB >> 16960972

On the inference of parsimonious indel evolutionary scenarios.

Leonid Chindelevitch1, Zhentao Li, Eric Blais, Mathieu Blanchette.   

Abstract

Given a multiple alignment of orthologous DNA sequences and a phylogenetic tree for these sequences, we investigate the problem of reconstructing a most parsimonious scenario of insertions and deletions capable of explaining the gaps observed in the alignment. This problem, called the Indel Parsimony Problem, is a crucial component of the problem of ancestral genome reconstruction, and its solution provides valuable information to many genome functional annotation approaches. We first show that the problem is NP-complete. Second, we provide an algorithm, based on the fractional relaxation of an integer linear programming formulation. The algorithm is fast in practice, and the solutions it produces are, in most cases, provably optimal. We describe a divide-and-conquer approach that makes it possible to solve very large instances on a simple desktop machine, while retaining guaranteed optimality. Our algorithms are tested and shown efficient and accurate on a set of 1.8 Mb mammalian orthologous sequences in the CFTR region.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16960972     DOI: 10.1142/s0219720006002168

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bioinform Comput Biol        ISSN: 0219-7200            Impact factor:   1.122


  12 in total

1.  PhyLAT: a phylogenetic local alignment tool.

Authors:  Hongtao Sun; Jeremy D Buhler
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2012-04-06       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  Genome-wide nucleotide-level mammalian ancestor reconstruction.

Authors:  Benedict Paten; Javier Herrero; Stephen Fitzgerald; Kathryn Beal; Paul Flicek; Ian Holmes; Ewan Birney
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2008-10-10       Impact factor: 9.043

3.  Greedy selection of species for ancestral state reconstruction on phylogenies: elimination is better than insertion.

Authors:  Guoliang Li; Jian Ma; Louxin Zhang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-02-04       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Phylo: a citizen science approach for improving multiple sequence alignment.

Authors:  Alexander Kawrykow; Gary Roumanis; Alfred Kam; Daniel Kwak; Clarence Leung; Chu Wu; Eleyine Zarour; Luis Sarmenta; Mathieu Blanchette; Jérôme Waldispühl
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-03-07       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Strong heterogeneity in mutation rate causes misleading hallmarks of natural selection on indel mutations in the human genome.

Authors:  Erika M Kvikstad; Laurent Duret
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2013-10-09       Impact factor: 16.240

6.  Characterization of multiple sequence alignment errors using complete-likelihood score and position-shift map.

Authors:  Kiyoshi Ezawa
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  Towards realistic benchmarks for multiple alignments of non-coding sequences.

Authors:  Jaebum Kim; Saurabh Sinha
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-01-26       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  A macaque's-eye view of human insertions and deletions: differences in mechanisms.

Authors:  Erika M Kvikstad; Svitlana Tyekucheva; Francesca Chiaromonte; Kateryna D Makova
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2007-07-27       Impact factor: 4.475

9.  Probabilistic phylogenetic inference with insertions and deletions.

Authors:  Elena Rivas; Sean R Eddy
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2008-09-19       Impact factor: 4.475

10.  A unifying model of genome evolution under parsimony.

Authors:  Benedict Paten; Daniel R Zerbino; Glenn Hickey; David Haussler
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2014-06-19       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.