Frederick Wolfe1, Kaleb Michaud, Tracy Li. 1. National Data Bank for Rheumatic Diseases, University of Kansas School of Medicine, Wichita, Kansas 67214, USA. fwolfe@arthritis-research.org
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Except for some polysomnography studies, there have been no large quantitative studies of sleep disturbance (SD) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). SD has taken on new importance with the observation that etanercept and infliximab reduce daytime sleepiness, and patient groups indicate that sleep is an important issue. METHODS: We evaluated 8676 patients with RA and a comparison group of 1364 subjects with non-fibromyalgia, noninflammatory disorders (NID) using the Medical Outcome Study (MOS) sleep questionnaire, including 2 MOS sleep problem indexes (SPI-I, SPI-II) and the MOS SD scale. In addition, patients completed a visual analog scale (VAS) sleep disturbance scale (SDS). RESULTS: The scales had similar mean values: SPI-I 35.4 (19.4), SPI-II 36.0 (19.1), SDS 35.0 (24.7), and VAS sleep 36.1 (29.7), and the values for the MOS scales exceeded population norms by 25% (VAS by 42%). In multivariable analyses SD was primarily determined by pain and mood. Patients receiving anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) did not have less abnormal sleep scores. SD was comparable in RA and NID. The VAS scale was more strongly associated with RA clinical variables than the MOS scales; however, the distributional characteristics of the scales differed, with the VAS scales capturing more extreme values. The standard error of the measurement (SEM), which is related to minimal (important) change, was SPI-I 9.0, SPI-II 7.3, SDS 9.6, and VAS sleep 10.4. CONCLUSION: SD is increased in RA, and 25% to 42% of SD can be attributed to RA. SD is linked to pain, mood, and disease activity. SD is slightly greater in women and is less with increasing age. All scales appear to be valid in RA, with minimal differences in SEM.
OBJECTIVE: Except for some polysomnography studies, there have been no large quantitative studies of sleep disturbance (SD) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). SD has taken on new importance with the observation that etanercept and infliximab reduce daytime sleepiness, and patient groups indicate that sleep is an important issue. METHODS: We evaluated 8676 patients with RA and a comparison group of 1364 subjects with non-fibromyalgia, noninflammatory disorders (NID) using the Medical Outcome Study (MOS) sleep questionnaire, including 2 MOS sleep problem indexes (SPI-I, SPI-II) and the MOS SD scale. In addition, patients completed a visual analog scale (VAS) sleep disturbance scale (SDS). RESULTS: The scales had similar mean values: SPI-I 35.4 (19.4), SPI-II 36.0 (19.1), SDS 35.0 (24.7), and VAS sleep 36.1 (29.7), and the values for the MOS scales exceeded population norms by 25% (VAS by 42%). In multivariable analyses SD was primarily determined by pain and mood. Patients receiving anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) did not have less abnormal sleep scores. SD was comparable in RA and NID. The VAS scale was more strongly associated with RA clinical variables than the MOS scales; however, the distributional characteristics of the scales differed, with the VAS scales capturing more extreme values. The standard error of the measurement (SEM), which is related to minimal (important) change, was SPI-I 9.0, SPI-II 7.3, SDS 9.6, and VAS sleep 10.4. CONCLUSION: SD is increased in RA, and 25% to 42% of SD can be attributed to RA. SD is linked to pain, mood, and disease activity. SD is slightly greater in women and is less with increasing age. All scales appear to be valid in RA, with minimal differences in SEM.
Authors: Perry M Nicassio; Sarah R Ormseth; Mara K Custodio; Michael R Irwin; Richard Olmstead; Michael H Weisman Journal: J Rheumatol Date: 2012-06-01 Impact factor: 4.666
Authors: Megan E Petrov; Burel R Goodin; Yenisel Cruz-Almeida; Chris King; Toni L Glover; Hailey W Bulls; Matthew Herbert; Kimberly T Sibille; Emily J Bartley; Barri J Fessler; Adriana Sotolongo; Roland Staud; David Redden; Roger B Fillingim; Laurence A Bradley Journal: J Pain Date: 2015-02-25 Impact factor: 5.820
Authors: Grant H Louie; Maria G Tektonidou; Alberto J Caban-Martinez; Michael M Ward Journal: Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) Date: 2011-02 Impact factor: 4.794
Authors: Jon Lampa; Marie Westman; Diana Kadetoff; Anna Nordenstedt Agréus; Erwan Le Maître; Caroline Gillis-Haegerstrand; Magnus Andersson; Mohsen Khademi; Maripat Corr; Christina A Christianson; Ada Delaney; Tony L Yaksh; Eva Kosek; Camilla I Svensson Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2012-07-16 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Yvonne C Lee; Lori B Chibnik; Bing Lu; Ajay D Wasan; Robert R Edwards; Anne H Fossel; Simon M Helfgott; Daniel H Solomon; Daniel J Clauw; Elizabeth W Karlson Journal: Arthritis Res Ther Date: 2009-10-29 Impact factor: 5.156