Literature DB >> 16960519

Comparison of the 2001 BRFSS and the IPAQ Physical Activity Questionnaires.

Barbara E Ainsworth1, Caroline A Macera, Deborah A Jones, Jared P Reis, Cheryl L Addy, Heather R Bowles, Harold W Kohl.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The 2001 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) physical activity module and the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) are used in population studies to determine the prevalence of physical activity. The comparability of the prevalence estimates has not been compared in U.S. adults. This study compares the physical activity prevalence estimates from the BRFSS and the IPAQ.
METHODS: A telephone survey was administered to a random sample of 11,211 U.S. adults aged 18-99 yr who were enrolled in the National Physical Activity and Weight Loss Survey. Data were analyzed from 9945 adults who provided complete data on the BRFSS and the IPAQ. Prevalence estimates were computed (1) applying the BRFSS scoring scheme for both questionnaires (2). Kappa statistics were used to compare prevalence estimates generated from the BRFSS and the IPAQ.
RESULTS: When scored using the BRFSS protocol, agreement between physical activity categories was fair (kappa = 0.34-0.49). Prevalence estimates were higher on the IPAQ than the BRFSS for the lowest category (inactive) by 0.1-3.9% and for the highest category (meets recommendations) by 0.2-9.7%. When scored using their own scoring, agreement between physical activity categories was lower (kappa = 0.26-0.39). The prevalence estimates on the IPAQ were higher than on the BRFSS for the lowest physical activity category by 0.2-13.3% and for the highest physical activity category by 0-16.4%. Differences in physical activity categories were observed for sex, age, income, education, and body mass index on both questionnaires.
CONCLUSION: Because of differences in the physical activity prevalence estimates, direct comparison of the BRFSS and IPAQ prevalence estimates is not recommended.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16960519     DOI: 10.1249/01.mss.0000229457.73333.9a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc        ISSN: 0195-9131            Impact factor:   5.411


  51 in total

1.  Sociodemographic Moderators of Environment-Physical Activity Associations: Results From the International Prevalence Study.

Authors:  Lilian G Perez; Terry L Conway; Adrian Bauman; Jacqueline Kerr; John P Elder; Elva M Arredondo; James F Sallis
Journal:  J Phys Act Health       Date:  2017-10-20

2.  Meeting U.S. Healthy People 2010 levels of physical activity: agreement of 2 measures across 2 years.

Authors:  Rod K Dishman; Cherie R Rooks; Nathaniel J Thom; Robert W Motl; Claudio R Nigg
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.797

3.  Validity of a multipass, web-based, 24-hour self-administered recall for assessment of total energy intake in blacks and whites.

Authors:  Lenore Arab; Chi-Hong Tseng; Alfonso Ang; Patricia Jardack
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2011-10-20       Impact factor: 4.897

4.  Physical activity of Croatian population: cross-sectional study using International Physical Activity Questionnaire.

Authors:  Danijel Jurakić; Zeljko Pedisić; Mirna Andrijasević
Journal:  Croat Med J       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.351

5.  Using technology to promote postpartum weight loss in urban, low-income mothers: a pilot randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Sharon J Herring; Jane F Cruice; Gary G Bennett; Adam Davey; Gary D Foster
Journal:  J Nutr Educ Behav       Date:  2014-07-26       Impact factor: 3.045

6.  The vascular phenotype of children with systemic lupus erythematosus.

Authors:  Catherine Quinlan; Jameela Kari; Clarissa Pilkington; John Deanfield; Rukshana Shroff; Stephen D Marks; Kjell Tullus
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2015-05-23       Impact factor: 3.714

7.  The Stanford Leisure-Time Activity Categorical Item (L-Cat): a single categorical item sensitive to physical activity changes in overweight/obese women.

Authors:  M Kiernan; D E Schoffman; K Lee; S D Brown; J M Fair; M G Perri; W L Haskell
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2013-04-16       Impact factor: 5.095

Review 8.  A review of physical activity measures used among US Latinos: guidelines for developing culturally appropriate measures.

Authors:  Suzanna M Martinez; Barbara E Ainsworth; John P Elder
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2008-10-15

9.  Evaluation of a community-based participatory physical activity promotion project: effect on cardiovascular disease risk profiles of school employees.

Authors:  Noha H Farag; William E Moore; David M Thompson; Cee E Kobza; Kathryn Abbott; June E Eichner
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2010-06-05       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  The International Prevalence Study on Physical Activity: results from 20 countries.

Authors:  Adrian Bauman; Fiona Bull; Tien Chey; Cora L Craig; Barbara E Ainsworth; James F Sallis; Heather R Bowles; Maria Hagstromer; Michael Sjostrom; Michael Pratt
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2009-03-31       Impact factor: 6.457

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.