Literature DB >> 16960064

Conventional identification of Streptococcus uberis isolated from bovine mastitis in Argentinean dairy herds.

L Odierno1, L Calvinho, P Traverssa, M Lasagno, C Bogni, E Reinoso.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate a conventional scheme for identifying Streptococcus uberis strains isolated from bovine mastitis. Seventy-five gram-positive, catalase-negative cocci were collected from cows with mastitis from 19 dairy herds located in the east-central region of Argentina. Five American Type Culture Collection strains and bovine isolates were identified by the API 20 Strep system and by restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis of 16S rDNA. A conventional scheme based on 11 biochemical tests was selected for identification of Strep. uberis strains: the Christie-Atkins-Munch-Petersen reaction; hydrolysis of Arg, esculin, and sodium hippurate; growth in inulin, mannitol, raffinose, salicin, and sorbitol; and growth at 45 degrees C and in 6.5% NaCl. Reference strains and 25 bovine isolates were classified accurately to the species level by the conventional scheme in a blind assay. Each reference strain and each bovine isolate were identified as belonging to the same species following these 3 methods. The remaining 50 isolates identified as Strep. uberis by the API 20 Strep system and 16S rDNA RFLP were assayed by the conventional scheme. This scheme correctly identified 47 (94%) of 50 isolates as Strep. uberis by comparing their biochemical profile with that of the reference strain. Three (6%) of the 50 isolates were classified as Strep. uberis by the API 20 Strep system and by 16S rDNA RFLP and were identified as Enterococcus faecalis by the conventional scheme. Thirty percent of the Strep. uberis strains showed biochemical profiles identical to the Strep. uberis American Type Culture Collection 27958 strain. Seventy percent of the Strep. uberis strains demonstrated variability compared with the reference strain, resulting in 19 different biochemical profiles. The conventional scheme proposed in this study resulted in a relatively low number of misidentifications and could biochemically identify not only typical, but also atypical Strep. uberis strains. This conventional scheme can be considered an adequate method for identifying Strep. uberis strains isolated from bovine mastitis because of its affordable cost in developing countries, and it may contribute to determining the frequency of isolation of Strep. uberis strains in Argentinean dairy herds.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16960064     DOI: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(06)72431-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dairy Sci        ISSN: 0022-0302            Impact factor:   4.034


  4 in total

1.  Incidence of subclinical mastitis and prevalence of major mastitis pathogens in organized farms and unorganized sectors.

Authors:  Raveendra Hegde; Shrikrishna Isloor; K Nithin Prabhu; B R Shome; D Rathnamma; V V S Suryanarayana; S Yatiraj; C Renuka Prasad; N Krishnaveni; S Sundareshan; D S Akhila; A R Gomes; Nagendra R Hegde
Journal:  Indian J Microbiol       Date:  2012-11-23       Impact factor: 2.461

2.  Comment on "Intravitreal Ampicillin Sodium for Antibiotic-Resistant Endophthalmitis: Streptococcus uberis First Human Intraocular Infection Report".

Authors:  Luigi Toma; Enea Gino Di Domenico; Grazia Prignano; Fabrizio Ensoli
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-07-22       Impact factor: 1.909

3.  Phenotypic and genotypic identification of streptococci and related bacteria isolated from bovine intramammary infections.

Authors:  Andreas Raemy; Mireille Meylan; Simona Casati; Valeria Gaia; Beat Berchtold; Renate Boss; Anja Wyder; Hans U Graber
Journal:  Acta Vet Scand       Date:  2013-07-18       Impact factor: 1.695

4.  Isolation, Biochemical and Molecular Identification, and In-Vitro Antimicrobial Resistance Patterns of Bacteria Isolated from Bubaline Subclinical Mastitis in South India.

Authors:  P L Preethirani; Shrikrishna Isloor; S Sundareshan; V Nuthanalakshmi; K Deepthikiran; Akhauri Y Sinha; D Rathnamma; K Nithin Prabhu; R Sharada; Trilochan K Mukkur; Nagendra R Hegde
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-20       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.