Literature DB >> 16959945

Structural requirements of transmembrane domain 3 for activation by the M1 muscarinic receptor agonists AC-42, AC-260584, clozapine, and N-desmethylclozapine: evidence for three distinct modes of receptor activation.

Tracy A Spalding1, Jian-Nong Ma, Thomas R Ott, Mikael Friberg, Abhishek Bajpai, Stefania Risso Bradley, Robert E Davis, Mark R Brann, Ethan S Burstein.   

Abstract

Transmembrane domain 3 (TM3) plays a crucial role mediating muscarinic acetylcholine receptor activation by acetylcholine, carbachol, and other muscarinic agonists. We compared the effects of point mutations throughout TM3 on the interactions of carbachol, 4-n-butyl-1-[4-(2-methylphenyl)-4-oxo-1-butyl] piperidine hydrogen chloride (AC-42), a potent structural analog of AC-42 called 4-[3-(4-butylpiperidin-1-yl)-propyl]-7-fluoro-4H-benzo[1,4]oxazin-3-one (AC-260584), N-desmethylclozapine, and clozapine with the M(1) muscarinic receptor. The binding and activation profiles of these ligands fell into three distinct patterns; one exemplified by orthosteric compounds like carbachol, another by structural analogs of AC-42, and a third by structural analogs of N-desmethylclozapine. All mutations tested severely reduced carbachol binding and activation of M(1). In contrast, the agonist actions of AC-42 and AC-260584 were greatly potentiated by the W101A mutation, slightly reduced by Y106A, and slightly increased by S109A. Clozapine and N-desmethylclozapine displayed substantially increased maximum responses at the Y106A and W101A mutants, slightly lower activity at S109A, but no substantial changes in potency. At L102A and N110A, agonist responses to AC-42, AC-260584, clozapine, and N-desmethylclozapine were all substantially reduced, but usually less than carbachol. D105A showed no functional responses to all ligands. Displacement and dissociation rate experiments demonstrated clear allosteric properties of AC-42 and AC-260584 but not for N-desmethylclozapine and clozapine, indicating that they may contact different residues than carbachol to activate M(1) but occupy substantially overlapping spaces, in contrast to AC-42 and AC-260584, which occupy separable spaces. These results show that M(1) receptors can be activated in at least three distinct ways and that there is no requirement for potent muscarinic agonists to mimic acetylcholine interactions with TM3.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16959945     DOI: 10.1124/mol.106.024901

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Pharmacol        ISSN: 0026-895X            Impact factor:   4.436


  27 in total

Review 1.  Allosteric activators of muscarinic receptors as novel approaches for treatment of CNS disorders.

Authors:  Gregory J Digby; Jana K Shirey; P Jeffrey Conn
Journal:  Mol Biosyst       Date:  2010-06-25

2.  A novel selective muscarinic acetylcholine receptor subtype 1 antagonist reduces seizures without impairing hippocampus-dependent learning.

Authors:  Douglas J Sheffler; Richard Williams; Thomas M Bridges; Zixiu Xiang; Alexander S Kane; Nellie E Byun; Satyawan Jadhav; Mathew M Mock; Fang Zheng; L Michelle Lewis; Carrie K Jones; Colleen M Niswender; Charles D Weaver; Craig W Lindsley; P Jeffrey Conn
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  2009-04-30       Impact factor: 4.436

3.  Identification of orthosteric and allosteric site mutations in M2 muscarinic acetylcholine receptors that contribute to ligand-selective signaling bias.

Authors:  Karen J Gregory; Nathan E Hall; Andrew B Tobin; Patrick M Sexton; Arthur Christopoulos
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2010-01-05       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  Contrasting effects of allosteric and orthosteric agonists on m1 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor internalization and down-regulation.

Authors:  Rachel L Thomas; Christopher J Langmead; Martyn D Wood; R A John Challiss
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  2009-09-18       Impact factor: 4.030

Review 5.  Alzheimer's disease and age-related memory decline (preclinical).

Authors:  Alvin V Terry; Patrick M Callahan; Brandon Hall; Scott J Webster
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  2011-02-24       Impact factor: 3.533

6.  A Novel Voltage Sensor in the Orthosteric Binding Site of the M2 Muscarinic Receptor.

Authors:  Ofra Barchad-Avitzur; Michael F Priest; Noa Dekel; Francisco Bezanilla; Hanna Parnas; Yair Ben-Chaim
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2016-10-04       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  Stimulus bias provides evidence for conformational constraints in the structure of a G protein-coupled receptor.

Authors:  Karen J Gregory; Patrick M Sexton; Andrew B Tobin; Arthur Christopoulos
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2012-09-10       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 8.  Development of M1 mAChR allosteric and bitopic ligands: prospective therapeutics for the treatment of cognitive deficits.

Authors:  Briana J Davie; Arthur Christopoulos; Peter J Scammells
Journal:  ACS Chem Neurosci       Date:  2013-05-23       Impact factor: 4.418

9.  Molecular mechanisms of action and in vivo validation of an M4 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor allosteric modulator with potential antipsychotic properties.

Authors:  Katie Leach; Richard E Loiacono; Christian C Felder; David L McKinzie; Adrian Mogg; David B Shaw; Patrick M Sexton; Arthur Christopoulos
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2009-11-25       Impact factor: 7.853

10.  Differential regulation of muscarinic M1 receptors by orthosteric and allosteric ligands.

Authors:  Christopher N Davis; Stefania Risso Bradley; Hans H Schiffer; Mikael Friberg; Kristian Koch; Bo-Ragnar Tolf; Douglas W Bonhaus; Jelveh Lameh
Journal:  BMC Pharmacol       Date:  2009-12-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.