Literature DB >> 16959722

Inferior vena cava filter placement in late-stage cancer.

Christian Schunn1, Gisa B Schunn, Gerry Hobbs, Linda C Vona-Davis, Usman Waheed.   

Abstract

Inferior vena cava (IVC) filters are increasingly used in patients with advanced-stage cancer for prophylaxis of pulmonary embolus. We evaluated the survival benefit of placing IVC filters in patients with late-stage malignancy and assessed their effectiveness in preventing pulmonary embolism. Between 1998 and 2003, 5,970 patients were treated with a primary diagnosis of malignancy at a tertiary care facility. Retrospective analysis identified 55 consecutive patients with stage III or IV malignant disease and venous thromboembolism (VTE) who received IVC filters. Retrospective review of electronic hospital charts identified subsequent pulmonary emboli, procedure-related complications, and survival. In a case control study, 16 patients with VTE but without IVC filter were matched for age, sex, type of malignancy, and stage of disease. IVC filter placement effectively prevented computed tomography (CT) scan or ventilation/perfusion ratio (V/Q) scan-proven pulmonary embolus in 52/55 (94.5%) patients. Complications developed in 4/55 or 7.3% of patients; 13/55 (23.6%) patients with late-stage cancer survived less than 30 days following placement of the filter. Another 23.6% of this group survived longer than 1 year. Ambulatory status differed significantly (p = 0.01) between these 2 subgroups. In the case control study, IVC filter placement conferred no survival benefit compared to the control group. One recurrent pulmonary embolism was observed in both the filter group and the control group. No deaths due to thromboembolic complications were observed in either group. In late-stage cancer, patient survival is limited primarily by the malignant process. While IVC filter placement is effective in preventing pulmonary emboli, there may be limited survival benefit in this particular patient population. However, there exists a subset of this population whose functional status predicts longer survival times after filter placement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16959722     DOI: 10.1177/1538574406291821

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vasc Endovascular Surg        ISSN: 1538-5744            Impact factor:   1.089


  14 in total

Review 1.  Optional inferior vena caval filters: where are we now?

Authors:  A N Keeling; T B Kinney; M J Lee
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-04-02       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Procedural and indwelling complications with inferior vena cava filters: frequency, etiology, and management.

Authors:  Lazar Milovanovic; Sean A Kennedy; Mehran Midia
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 1.513

Review 3.  Are too many inferior vena cava filters used? Controversial evidences in different clinical settings: a narrative review.

Authors:  Michele Dalla Vestra; Elisabetta Grolla; Luca Bonanni; Raffaele Pesavento
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 3.397

Review 4.  The Role of Inferior Vena Cava Filters in Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Mithil B Pandhi; Kush R Desai; Robert K Ryu; Robert J Lewandowski
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 1.513

5.  [Vena cava filter. Which indications remain in the era of differentiated anticoagulation?].

Authors:  A H Mahnken
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 0.635

6.  IVC filters may prevent fatal pulmonary embolism in musculoskeletal tumor surgery.

Authors:  Benjamin Tuy; Chinmoy Bhate; Kathleen Beebe; Francis Patterson; Joseph Benevenia
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-11-07       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Venous thromboembolism treatment outcomes in cancer patients and effect of third-party payers on anticoagulant choice.

Authors:  Gary W Jean; Katherine Kelly; Jennie Mathew; Eneko Larumbe; Randall Hughes
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2016-08-20       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 8.  Venous thromboembolism in malignant gliomas.

Authors:  E O Jenkins; D Schiff; N Mackman; N S Key
Journal:  J Thromb Haemost       Date:  2009-11-13       Impact factor: 5.824

9.  Comparative outcomes of thrombocytopenic acute leukemic patients with venous thromboembolism at a Comprehensive Cancer Center.

Authors:  Maliha Khan; Travis M Cox; Mohammed Nassif; Mohanad A Alzubaidi; Naveen Garg; Wei Qiao; Fleur M Aung; Thein Hlaing Oo; Cristhiam M Rojas-Hernandez
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 2.300

10.  Inferior vena cava filters in cancer patients: to filter or not to filter.

Authors:  Hikmat Abdel-Razeq; Asem Mansour; Yousef Ismael; Hazem Abdulelah
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2011-03-10       Impact factor: 2.423

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.