Literature DB >> 16959427

Adjunctive self-hypnotic relaxation for outpatient medical procedures: a prospective randomized trial with women undergoing large core breast biopsy.

Elvira V Lang1, Kevin S Berbaum, Salomao Faintuch, Olga Hatsiopoulou, Noami Halsey, Xinyu Li, Michael L Berbaum, Eleanor Laser, Janet Baum.   

Abstract

Medical procedures in outpatient settings have limited options of managing pain and anxiety pharmacologically. We therefore assessed whether this can be achieved by adjunct self-hypnotic relaxation in a common and particularly anxiety provoking procedure. Two hundred and thirty-six women referred for large core needle breast biopsy to an urban tertiary university-affiliated medical center were prospectively randomized to receive standard care (n=76), structured empathic attention (n=82), or self-hypnotic relaxation (n=78) during their procedures. Patients' self-ratings at 1 min-intervals of pain and anxiety on 0-10 verbal analog scales with 0=no pain/anxiety at all, 10=worst pain/anxiety possible, were compared in an ordinal logistic regression model. Women's anxiety increased significantly in the standard group (logit slope=0.18, p<0.001), did not change in the empathy group (slope=-0.04, p=0.45), and decreased significantly in the hypnosis group (slope=-0.27, p<0.001). Pain increased significantly in all three groups (logit slopes: standard care=0.53, empathy=0.37, hypnosis=0.34; all p<0.001) though less steeply with hypnosis and empathy than standard care (p=0.024 and p=0.018, respectively). Room time and cost were not significantly different in an univariate ANOVA despite hypnosis and empathy requiring an additional professional: 46 min/161 dollars for standard care, 43 min/163 dollars for empathy, and 39 min/152 dollars for hypnosis. We conclude that, while both structured empathy and hypnosis decrease procedural pain and anxiety, hypnosis provides more powerful anxiety relief without undue cost and thus appears attractive for outpatient pain management.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16959427      PMCID: PMC2656356          DOI: 10.1016/j.pain.2006.06.035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain        ISSN: 0304-3959            Impact factor:   6.961


  22 in total

1.  Society of Interventional Radiology clinical practice guidelines.

Authors:  David Sacks; Tricia E McClenny; John F Cardella; Curtis A Lewis
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 3.464

2.  Unbalanced repeated-measures models with structured covariance matrices.

Authors:  R I Jennrich; M D Schluchter
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  The integrated approach to the management of pain. NIH Consensus Development Conference.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 3.612

4.  Random-effects models for longitudinal data.

Authors:  N M Laird; J H Ware
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Percutaneous core biopsy of the breast: correlates of anxiety.

Authors:  D M Novy; M Price; P T Huynh; A Schuetz
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.173

6.  Randomized comparison of sitting and prone positions for stereotactic fine-needle aspiration breast biopsy.

Authors:  T H Helbich; K Dantendorfer; G H Mostbeck; S Schick; P Wunderbaldinger; M Amering; R Alexandrowicz; G Wolf
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 6.939

7.  Benzodiazepine premedication: can it improve outcome in patients undergoing breast biopsy procedures?

Authors:  J M van Vlymen; M M Sá Rêgo; P F White
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 7.892

8.  [Pain and anxiety related to mammography in breast cancer patients. Psychological evaluation in an experimental study].

Authors:  A Caruso; F Efficace; A Parrila; L Angelone; F Ferranti; M L Grandinetti
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2001 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.469

9.  Imaging-Guided Core Needle Biopsy of the Breast: Study of Psychological Outcomes.

Authors:  James R. Maxwell; Mary E. Bugbee; David Wellisch; Anat Shalmon; James Sayre; Lawrence W. Bassett
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 2.431

10.  Educating interventional radiology personnel in nonpharmacologic analgesia: effect on patients' pain perception.

Authors:  E V Lang; K S Berbaum
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 3.173

View more
  37 in total

1.  Positive suggestion techniques in somatic medicine: A review of the empirical studies.

Authors:  Zoltán Kekecs; Katalin Varga
Journal:  Interv Med Appl Sci       Date:  2013-09-16

2.  Intentions to use hypnosis to control the side effects of cancer and its treatment.

Authors:  Stephanie J Sohl; Lauren Stossel; Julie B Schnur; Kristin Tatrow; Amfiana Gherman; Guy H Montgomery
Journal:  Am J Clin Hypn       Date:  2010-10

3.  Disseminating hypnosis to health care settings: Applying the RE-AIM framework.

Authors:  Vivian M Yeh; Julie B Schnur; Guy H Montgomery
Journal:  Psychol Conscious (Wash D C)       Date:  2014-06

4.  Randomized Controlled Trial of Brief Mindfulness Training and Hypnotic Suggestion for Acute Pain Relief in the Hospital Setting.

Authors:  Eric L Garland; Anne K Baker; Paula Larsen; Michael R Riquino; Sarah E Priddy; Elizabeth Thomas; Adam W Hanley; Patricia Galbraith; Nathan Wanner; Yoshio Nakamura
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 5.  Conversion Disorder, Functional Neurological Symptom Disorder, and Chronic Pain: Comorbidity, Assessment, and Treatment.

Authors:  Patricia Tsui; Andrew Deptula; Derek Y Yuan
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2017-06

Review 6.  Hypnosis for Symptom Control in Cancer Patients at the End-of-Life: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Guy H Montgomery; Madalina Sucala; Tessa Baum; Julie B Schnur
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Hypn       Date:  2017 Jul-Sep

7.  Effect of team training on improving MRI study completion rates and no-show rates.

Authors:  Alexander Norbash; Kent Yucel; William Yuh; Gheorghe Doros; Amna Ajam; Elvira Lang; Stephen Pauker; Nina Mayr
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2016-04-06       Impact factor: 4.813

8.  The experience of pain and anxiety in rectal cancer patients during high-dose-rate brachytherapy.

Authors:  S Néron; S Perez; R Benc; A Bellman; Z Rosberger; T Vuong
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 3.677

9.  Pre-biopsy psychological factors predict patient biopsy experience.

Authors:  Sarah J Miller; Stephanie J Sohl; Julie B Schnur; Laurie Margolies; Jaclyn Bolno; Janet Szabo; George Hermann; Guy H Montgomery
Journal:  Int J Behav Med       Date:  2014-02

10.  A Better Patient Experience Through Better Communication.

Authors:  Elvira V Lang
Journal:  J Radiol Nurs       Date:  2012-12-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.