Literature DB >> 16959217

Electrical behavior and pore accumulation in a multicellular model for conventional and supra-electroporation.

T R Gowrishankar1, James C Weaver.   

Abstract

Extremely large but very short (20 kV/cm, 300 ns) electric field pulses were reported recently to non-thermally destroy melanoma tumors. The stated mechanism for field penetration into cells is pulse characteristic times faster than charge redistribution (displacement currents). Here we use a multicellular model with irregularly shaped, closely spaced cells to show that instead overwhelming pore creation (supra-electroporation) is dominant, with field penetration due to pores (ionic conduction currents) during most of the pulse. Moreover, the model's maximum membrane potential (about 1.2 V) is consistent with recent experimental observations on isolated cells. We also use the model to show that conventional electroporation resulting from 100 microsecond, 1 kV/cm pulses yields a spatially heterogeneous electroporation distribution. In contrast, the melanoma-destroying pulses cause nearly homogeneous electroporation of cells and their nuclear membranes. Electropores can persist for times much longer than the pulses, and are likely to be an important mechanism contributing to cell death.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16959217      PMCID: PMC1698465          DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2006.08.097

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun        ISSN: 0006-291X            Impact factor:   3.575


  28 in total

1.  Intracellular effect of ultrashort electrical pulses.

Authors:  K H Schoenbach; S J Beebe; E S Buescher
Journal:  Bioelectromagnetics       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 2.010

2.  The effects of intense submicrosecond electrical pulses on cells.

Authors:  Jingdong Deng; Karl H Schoenbach; E Stephen Buescher; Pamela S Hair; Paula M Fox; Stephen J Beebe
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 3.  Single-cell electroporation.

Authors:  Jessica Olofsson; Kerstin Nolkrantz; Frida Ryttsén; Bradley A Lambie; Stephen G Weber; Owe Orwar
Journal:  Curr Opin Biotechnol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 9.740

4.  Nanosecond, high-intensity pulsed electric fields induce apoptosis in human cells.

Authors:  Stephen J Beebe; Paula M Fox; Laura J Rec; E Lauren K Willis; Karl H Schoenbach
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2003-06-17       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Nanoelectropulse-induced phosphatidylserine translocation.

Authors:  P Thomas Vernier; Yinghua Sun; Laura Marcu; Cheryl M Craft; Martin A Gundersen
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  Model of creation and evolution of stable electropores for DNA delivery.

Authors:  Kyle C Smith; John C Neu; Wanda Krassowska
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  Tissue electroporation. Observation of reversible electrical breakdown in viable frog skin.

Authors:  K T Powell; A W Morgenthaler; J C Weaver
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 4.033

8.  Effects of a high-voltage electrical impulse and an anticancer drug on in vivo growing tumors.

Authors:  M Okino; H Mohri
Journal:  Jpn J Cancer Res       Date:  1987-12

9.  Electrochemotherapy potentiation of antitumour effect of bleomycin by local electric pulses.

Authors:  L M Mir; S Orlowski; J Belehradek; C Paoletti
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 9.162

10.  Calcium bursts induced by nanosecond electric pulses.

Authors:  P Thomas Vernier; Yinghua Sun; Laura Marcu; Sarah Salemi; Cheryl M Craft; Martin A Gundersen
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2003-10-17       Impact factor: 3.575

View more
  40 in total

1.  Plasma membrane permeabilization by trains of ultrashort electric pulses.

Authors:  Bennett L Ibey; Dustin G Mixon; Jason A Payne; Angela Bowman; Karl Sickendick; Gerald J Wilmink; W Patrick Roach; Andrei G Pakhomov
Journal:  Bioelectrochemistry       Date:  2010-01-20       Impact factor: 5.373

2.  Manipulation of cell volume and membrane pore comparison following single cell permeabilization with 60- and 600-ns electric pulses.

Authors:  Olena M Nesin; Olga N Pakhomova; Shu Xiao; Andrei G Pakhomov
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2010-12-20

3.  Quantification of electroporative uptake kinetics and electric field heterogeneity effects in cells.

Authors:  S M Kennedy; Z Ji; J C Hedstrom; J H Booske; S C Hagness
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2008-03-13       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Active mechanisms are needed to describe cell responses to submicrosecond, megavolt-per-meter pulses: cell models for ultrashort pulses.

Authors:  Kyle C Smith; James C Weaver
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2008-04-11       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Optimized nanosecond pulsed electric field therapy can cause murine malignant melanomas to self-destruct with a single treatment.

Authors:  Richard Nuccitelli; Kevin Tran; Saleh Sheikh; Brian Athos; Mark Kreis; Pamela Nuccitelli
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2010-10-01       Impact factor: 7.396

6.  Analysis of plasma membrane integrity by fluorescent detection of Tl(+) uptake.

Authors:  Angela M Bowman; Olena M Nesin; Olga N Pakhomova; Andrei G Pakhomov
Journal:  J Membr Biol       Date:  2010-07-11       Impact factor: 1.843

Review 7.  A brief overview of electroporation pulse strength-duration space: a region where additional intracellular effects are expected.

Authors:  James C Weaver; Kyle C Smith; Axel T Esser; Reuben S Son; T R Gowrishankar
Journal:  Bioelectrochemistry       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 5.373

8.  Multiple nanosecond electric pulses increase the number but not the size of long-lived nanopores in the cell membrane.

Authors:  Andrei G Pakhomov; Elena Gianulis; P Thomas Vernier; Iurii Semenov; Shu Xiao; Olga N Pakhomova
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2015-01-10

9.  Primary pathways of intracellular Ca(2+) mobilization by nanosecond pulsed electric field.

Authors:  Iurii Semenov; Shu Xiao; Andrei G Pakhomov
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2012-12-05

10.  Electropermeabilization of endocytotic vesicles in B16 F1 mouse melanoma cells.

Authors:  Tina Batista Napotnik; Matej Rebersek; Tadej Kotnik; Eric Lebrasseur; Gonzalo Cabodevila; Damijan Miklavcic
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2010-04-02       Impact factor: 2.602

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.