Literature DB >> 16958861

Accounting for uncertainty in marine reserve design.

Benjamin S Halpern1, Helen M Regan, Hugh P Possingham, Michael A McCarthy.   

Abstract

Ecosystems and the species and communities within them are highly complex systems that defy predictions with any degree of certainty. Managing and conserving these systems in the face of uncertainty remains a daunting challenge, particularly with respect to developing networks of marine reserves. Here we review several modelling frameworks that explicitly acknowledge and incorporate uncertainty, and then use these methods to evaluate reserve spacing rules given increasing levels of uncertainty about larval dispersal distances. Our approach finds similar spacing rules as have been proposed elsewhere - roughly 20-200 km - but highlights several advantages provided by uncertainty modelling over more traditional approaches to developing these estimates. In particular, we argue that uncertainty modelling can allow for (1) an evaluation of the risk associated with any decision based on the assumed uncertainty; (2) a method for quantifying the costs and benefits of reducing uncertainty; and (3) a useful tool for communicating to stakeholders the challenges in managing highly uncertain systems. We also argue that incorporating rather than avoiding uncertainty will increase the chances of successfully achieving conservation and management goals.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16958861     DOI: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00827.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecol Lett        ISSN: 1461-023X            Impact factor:   9.492


  10 in total

1.  Info-gap decision theory for assessing the management of catchments for timber production and urban water supply.

Authors:  Michael A McCarthy; David B Lindenmayer
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2007-02-19       Impact factor: 3.266

2.  Landscape connectivity promotes plant biodiversity spillover into non-target habitats.

Authors:  Lars A Brudvig; Ellen I Damschen; Joshua J Tewksbury; Nick M Haddad; Douglas J Levey
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-05-22       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Data acquisition for conservation assessments: is the effort worth it?

Authors:  Virgilio Hermoso; Mark J Kennard; Simon Linke
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Contending with uncertainty in conservation management decisions.

Authors:  Michael A McCarthy
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 5.691

5.  Bayesian estimates of transition probabilities in seven small lithophytic orchid populations: maximizing data availability from many small samples.

Authors:  Raymond L Tremblay; Michael A McCarthy
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-28       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Size, age, and habitat determine effectiveness of Palau's Marine Protected Areas.

Authors:  Alan M Friedlander; Yimnang Golbuu; Enric Ballesteros; Jennifer E Caselle; Marine Gouezo; Dawnette Olsudong; Enric Sala
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-30       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Managing uncertainty in movement knowledge for environmental decisions.

Authors:  Annabel L Smith; Heini Kujala; José J Lahoz-Monfort; Lydia K Guja; Emma L Burns; Ran Nathan; Erika Alacs; Philip S Barton; Sana Bau; Don A Driscoll; Pia E Lentini; Alessio Mortelliti; Ross Rowe; Yvonne M Buckley
Journal:  Conserv Lett       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 8.105

8.  A hierarchical classification of benthic biodiversity and assessment of protected areas in the Southern Ocean.

Authors:  Lucinda L Douglass; Joel Turner; Hedley S Grantham; Stefanie Kaiser; Andrew Constable; Rob Nicoll; Ben Raymond; Alexandra Post; Angelika Brandt; Daniel Beaver
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-17       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Restricted grouper reproductive migrations support community-based management.

Authors:  Peter A Waldie; Glenn R Almany; Tane H Sinclair-Taylor; Richard J Hamilton; Tapas Potuku; Mark A Priest; Kevin L Rhodes; Jan Robinson; Joshua E Cinner; Michael L Berumen
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2016-03-09       Impact factor: 2.963

10.  Using Bayesian Population Viability Analysis to Define Relevant Conservation Objectives.

Authors:  Adam W Green; Larissa L Bailey
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-10       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.