Literature DB >> 16957997

Analysis of randomized controlled trials on hepatopancreatic surgery.

Toshimi Kaido1.   

Abstract

The randomized controlled trial (RCT) is an important research method, providing the highest evidence and playing a pivotal role in the performance of evidence-based medicine. However, RCTs on hepatopancreatic surgery have been performed less frequently than RCTs in other fields. Therefore, this review analyzes the characteristics of RCTs on hepatic and pancreatic surgery to propose a breakthrough. We retrieved studies performed via a MEDLINE search to identify prospective RCTs on hepatopancreatic surgery in the last decade. Eligible RCTs were analyzed using the following items: study design, publication year, geographical area, sample size, multicenter study, and impact factor. Studies comparing surgical technique or methods have composed the majority of the RCTs involving hepatectomy and pancreatectomy. About half of the RCTs on hepatectomy have been performed in East Asia, whereas most of the RCTs on pancreatectomy were undertaken in Western countries. The average sample number of RCT on hepatectomy is significantly smaller than those in other fields. Moreover, multicenter studies are less frequently performed on hepatectomy compared with pancreatectomy. Promoting the organization of multicenter studies would be the best way to increase the number and sample size of RCTs on hepatectomy. Adequate RCTs observing the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials statements are necessary to obtain reliable evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16957997     DOI: 10.1007/s10620-006-9219-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Dis Sci        ISSN: 0163-2116            Impact factor:   3.199


  10 in total

1.  The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials.

Authors:  D Moher; K F Schulz; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2001-04-14       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Results of surgical and nonsurgical treatment for small-sized hepatocellular carcinomas: a retrospective and nationwide survey in Japan. The Liver Cancer Study Group of Japan.

Authors:  S Arii; Y Yamaoka; S Futagawa; K Inoue; K Kobayashi; M Kojiro; M Makuuchi; Y Nakamura; K Okita; R Yamada
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 17.425

Review 3.  Randomized controlled trials on hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery.

Authors:  Toshimi Kaido
Journal:  J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg       Date:  2004

4.  Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement.

Authors:  C Begg; M Cho; S Eastwood; R Horton; D Moher; I Olkin; R Pitkin; D Rennie; K F Schulz; D Simel; D F Stroup
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1996-08-28       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Randomized comparison of ultrasonic vs clamp transection of the liver.

Authors:  T Takayama; M Makuuchi; K Kubota; Y Harihara; A M Hui; K Sano; M Ijichi; K Hasegawa
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2001-08

6.  A randomized multicenter trial comparing resection and radiochemotherapy for resectable locally invasive pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Masayuki Imamura; Ryuichiro Doi; Toshihide Imaizumi; Akihiro Funakoshi; Hideyuki Wakasugi; Makoto Sunamura; Yoshiro Ogata; Shoichi Hishinuma; Takehide Asano; Takashi Aikou; Ryo Hosotani; Shunzo Maetani
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 3.982

7.  Continuous versus intermittent portal triad clamping for liver resection: a controlled study.

Authors:  J Belghiti; R Noun; R Malafosse; P Jagot; A Sauvanet; F Pierangeli; J Marty; O Farges
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Standard versus extended lymphadenectomy associated with pancreatoduodenectomy in the surgical treatment of adenocarcinoma of the head of the pancreas: a multicenter, prospective, randomized study. Lymphadenectomy Study Group.

Authors:  S Pedrazzoli; V DiCarlo; R Dionigi; F Mosca; P Pederzoli; C Pasquali; G Klöppel; K Dhaene; F Michelassi
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  A prospective randomized study in 100 consecutive patients undergoing major liver resection with versus without ischemic preconditioning.

Authors:  Pierre-Alain Clavien; Markus Selzner; Hannes A Rüdiger; Rolf Graf; Zakiyah Kadry; Valentin Rousson; Wolfram Jochum
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Abdominal drainage after hepatic resection is contraindicated in patients with chronic liver diseases.

Authors:  Chi-Leung Liu; Sheung-Tat Fan; Chung-Mau Lo; Yik Wong; Irene Oi-Lin Ng; Chi-Ming Lam; Ronnie Tung-Ping Poon; John Wong
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 12.969

  10 in total
  1 in total

Review 1.  Development of a composite endpoint for randomized controlled trials in pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Marielle M E Coolsen; Stefan H E M Clermonts; Ronald M van Dam; Bjorn Winkens; Massimo Malagó; Giuseppe K Fusai; Cornelis H C Dejong; Steven W M Olde Damink
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.352

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.