OBJECTIVE: The relative contribution of fasting and post-prandial glucose to glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) is controversial. In the present study, we assessed the relationship with HbA1c of fasting and post-prandial glucose measured in a more naturalistic setting, through home glucose self-monitoring or with a continuous glucose monitoring system (CGM). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A consecutive series of 300 patients with Type 2 diabetes were enrolled in the study, provided that they performed blood glucose self-monitoring. HbA1c and fasting plasma glucose (FPG) were measured at enrolment. RESULTS: Both fasting plasma and capillary glucose showed a significant correlation with HbA1c (r=0.66 and 0.61, respectively; p<0.001). When home glucose monitoring was considered, both mean fasting and post-prandial glucose showed a significant correlation with HbA1c (r=0.71 and 0.73, respectively). In patients in the lower tertile of body mass index (BMI), HbA1c showed a significant correlation at multivariate analysis with post-prandial glucose, but not with fasting glucose. In patients with HbA1c >7%, both fasting and post-prandial glucose showed a significant correlation, after adjustment for age and BMI, with HbA1c (both p<0.01); conversely, in those with HbA1c < or =7%, such a correlation could be observed for fasting (p<0.01), but not for post-prandial glucose. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, both fasting and post-prandial glucose contribute to the determination of HbA1c . Home glucose self-monitoring appears to provide a more accurate assessment of metabolic control than a single plasma glucose measurement in experimental conditions. Fasting glucose could provide a greater contribution to HbA1c in patients with lower HbA1c, while post-prandial glucose seems to play a major role in leaner Type 2 diabetic subjects.
OBJECTIVE: The relative contribution of fasting and post-prandial glucose to glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) is controversial. In the present study, we assessed the relationship with HbA1c of fasting and post-prandial glucose measured in a more naturalistic setting, through home glucose self-monitoring or with a continuous glucose monitoring system (CGM). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A consecutive series of 300 patients with Type 2 diabetes were enrolled in the study, provided that they performed blood glucose self-monitoring. HbA1c and fasting plasma glucose (FPG) were measured at enrolment. RESULTS: Both fasting plasma and capillary glucose showed a significant correlation with HbA1c (r=0.66 and 0.61, respectively; p<0.001). When home glucose monitoring was considered, both mean fasting and post-prandial glucose showed a significant correlation with HbA1c (r=0.71 and 0.73, respectively). In patients in the lower tertile of body mass index (BMI), HbA1c showed a significant correlation at multivariate analysis with post-prandial glucose, but not with fasting glucose. In patients with HbA1c >7%, both fasting and post-prandial glucose showed a significant correlation, after adjustment for age and BMI, with HbA1c (both p<0.01); conversely, in those with HbA1c < or =7%, such a correlation could be observed for fasting (p<0.01), but not for post-prandial glucose. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, both fasting and post-prandial glucose contribute to the determination of HbA1c . Home glucose self-monitoring appears to provide a more accurate assessment of metabolic control than a single plasma glucose measurement in experimental conditions. Fasting glucose could provide a greater contribution to HbA1c in patients with lower HbA1c, while post-prandial glucose seems to play a major role in leaner Type 2 diabetic subjects.
Authors: Valeriya Lyssenko; Peter Almgren; Dragi Anevski; Roland Perfekt; Kaj Lahti; Michael Nissén; Bo Isomaa; Björn Forsen; Nils Homström; Carola Saloranta; Marja-Riitta Taskinen; Leif Groop; Tiinamaija Tuomi Journal: Diabetes Date: 2005-01 Impact factor: 9.461
Authors: E Bonora; F Calcaterra; S Lombardi; N Bonfante; G Formentini; R C Bonadonna; M Muggeo Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2001-12 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: M Trovati; M C Ponziani; P Massucco; G Anfossi; E M Mularoni; S Burzacca; F Tassone; P Perna; M Traversa; F Cavalot Journal: Eur J Clin Invest Date: 2002-03 Impact factor: 4.686
Authors: Hans J Woerle; Walkyria P Pimenta; Christian Meyer; Niyaz R Gosmanov; Ervin Szoke; Tamas Szombathy; Asimina Mitrakou; John E Gerich Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2004 Aug 9-23
Authors: Laurence G Trahair; Thomas E Kimber; Katerina Flabouris; Michael Horowitz; Karen L Jones Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2016-05-28 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: David Russell-Jones; Simon R Heller; Sarah Buchs; Anna Sandberg; William J Valentine; Barnaby Hunt Journal: Diabetes Obes Metab Date: 2017-07-25 Impact factor: 6.577