Literature DB >> 16956978

Differential sensitivity to words and shapes in ventral occipito-temporal cortex.

Michal Ben-Shachar1, Robert F Dougherty, Gayle K Deutsch, Brian A Wandell.   

Abstract

Efficient extraction of shape information is essential for proficient reading but the role of cortical mechanisms of shape analysis in word reading is not well understood. We studied cortical responses to written words while parametrically varying the amount of visual noise applied to the word stimuli. In only a few regions along the ventral surface, cortical responses increased with word visibility. We found consistently increasing responses in bilateral posterior occipito-temporal sulcus (pOTS), at an anatomical location that closely matches the "visual word form area". In other cortical regions, such as V1, responses remained constant regardless of the noise level. We performed 3 additional tests to assess the functional specialization of pOTS responses for written word processing. We asked whether pOTS responses are 1) left lateralized, 2) more sensitive to words than to line drawings or false fonts, and 3) invariant for visual hemifield of words but not other stimuli. We found that left and right pOTS response functions both had highest sensitivity for words, intermediate for line drawings, and lowest for false fonts. Visual hemifield invariance was similar for words and line drawings. These results suggest that left and right pOTS are both involved in shape processing, with enhanced efficiency for processing visual word forms.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16956978     DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhl071

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cereb Cortex        ISSN: 1047-3211            Impact factor:   5.357


  48 in total

1.  The left occipitotemporal cortex does not show preferential activity for words.

Authors:  Alecia C Vogel; Steven E Petersen; Bradley L Schlaggar
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2012-01-10       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 2.  Interpreting fMRI data: maps, modules and dimensions.

Authors:  Hans P Op de Beeck; Johannes Haushofer; Nancy G Kanwisher
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 34.870

3.  Sensitivity to orthographic familiarity in the occipito-temporal region.

Authors:  Jennifer Lynn Bruno; Allison Zumberge; Franklin R Manis; Zhong-Lin Lu; Jason G Goldman
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-11-12       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  A surface-based analysis of language lateralization and cortical asymmetry.

Authors:  Douglas N Greve; Lise Van der Haegen; Qing Cai; Steven Stufflebeam; Mert R Sabuncu; Bruce Fischl; Marc Brysbaert
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2013-04-22       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Assimilation and accommodation patterns in ventral occipitotemporal cortex in learning a second writing system.

Authors:  Jessica R Nelson; Ying Liu; Julie Fiez; Charles A Perfetti
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Word learning and the cerebral hemispheres: from serial to parallel processing of written words.

Authors:  Andrew W Ellis; Roberto Ferreira; Polly Cathles-Hagan; Kathryn Holt; Lisa Jarvis; Laura Barca
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-12-27       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  The putative visual word form area is functionally connected to the dorsal attention network.

Authors:  Alecia C Vogel; Fran M Miezin; Steven E Petersen; Bradley L Schlaggar
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2011-06-20       Impact factor: 5.357

8.  The vertical occipital fasciculus: a century of controversy resolved by in vivo measurements.

Authors:  Jason D Yeatman; Kevin S Weiner; Franco Pestilli; Ariel Rokem; Aviv Mezer; Brian A Wandell
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-11-17       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Defining the most probable location of the parahippocampal place area using cortex-based alignment and cross-validation.

Authors:  Kevin S Weiner; Michael A Barnett; Nathan Witthoft; Golijeh Golarai; Anthony Stigliani; Kendrick N Kay; Jesse Gomez; Vaidehi S Natu; Katrin Amunts; Karl Zilles; Kalanit Grill-Spector
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Consistency and variability in functional localisers.

Authors:  Keith J Duncan; Chotiga Pattamadilok; Iris Knierim; Joseph T Devlin
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-03-14       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.