Literature DB >> 16956550

[Minimally invasive esophagectomy].

José L Elorza-Orúe1, Santiago Larburu-Etxaniz, José Ignacio Asensio-Gallego, José María Enríquez-Navascués, Miguel Echenique-Elizondo.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Currently, the bases for the treatment of esophageal cancer are surgical resection and chemotherapy. Among the various surgical techniques used, minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) aims to reduce surgical aggression and cardiopulmonary complications while maintaining basic oncological principles. We present the results of our initial experience with this technique in the treatment of esophageal cancer. MATERIAL AND
METHOD: Fourteen patients with a diagnosis of esophageal cancer were selected to undergo MIE in three stages: right thoracoscopy, laparoscopy, and left cervicotomy with cervical esophagogastric anastomosis. Histological diagnosis was epidermoid carcinoma (n = 11) and high grade dysplasia (n = 3), one of which was highly suspicious of malignant transformation. After extension studies, preoperative clinical stages were as follows: stage 0 (n = 3), stage IIA (n = 10), and stage III (n = 1). Seven patients were treated with chemotherapy and neoadjuvant radiotherapy and the remainder underwent surgery without prior treatment.
RESULTS: The mean operating time was 299 minutes (range: 195-425). The conversion rate was 14% (n = 2). Mortality was 0% and morbidity was 50%, consisting of three major complications and four minor complications. No anastomotic dehiscence or wound infections were observed. Complete (R0) resections were achieved in 92.8% (n = 13). Transfusion needs were 1.1 U/patient. The mean number of nodes removed was 10.2/patient (range: 5-17). The mean length of hospital stay was 21 days (range: 9-64). Postoperative follow-up ranged from 1 to 17 months. All patients were alive and disease-free except for one patient with liver metastases.
CONCLUSIONS: Although MIE is a demanding technique, we believe that it is technically feasible in the treatment of esophageal cancer with acceptable postoperative morbidity and mortality. Consequently, it should be considered as an alternative to open surgery in selected patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16956550     DOI: 10.1016/s0009-739x(06)70943-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cir Esp        ISSN: 0009-739X            Impact factor:   1.653


  2 in total

1.  Laparoscopic and thoracoscopic esophagectomy with intrathoracic anastomosis for middle or lower esophageal carcinoma.

Authors:  Bo Ai; Zheng Zhang; Yongde Liao
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  Comparison of the outcomes between thoracoscopic and laparoscopic esophagectomy via retrosternal and prevertebral lifting paths by the same surgeon.

Authors:  Bing Lv; Yong-Zhong Tao; Yu Zhu; Jing Wu; Bin Zhong; Fu-Chao Luo; Yang Liu; Ze-Xue Zhang
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 2.754

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.