Colin J Forman1, David W Johnson, David L Nicol. 1. Department of Renal Transplantation, University of Queensland at Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia. colinjforman@hotmail.com
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the administration of erythropoietin at the time of ischaemic renal injury (IRI) inhibits apoptosis, enhances tubular epithelial regeneration and promotes renal functional recovery, as it does in rodent models, in a higher mammalian model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The model of IRI involved unilateral nephrectomy in pigs, followed a week later by renal artery occlusion for 1 h, followed by reperfusion for 5 days. Pigs were randomized to receive erythropoietin 5000 units/kg intravenously at the time of ischaemia, followed by 1000 units/kg subcutaneously daily, or no treatment (six pigs each). Renal function and structure were analysed; blood and urine were collected daily to determine serum creatinine level, blood urea nitrogen, and creatinine clearance. Animals were killed after 5 days to obtain the injured kidneys. The kidneys were examined histologically for evidence of cellular mitosis, apoptosis and necrosis. RESULTS: Erythropoietin significantly abrogated renal dysfunction after IRI compared with controls at 12 h after injury; the mean (sem) creatinine clearance (as a percentage of baseline) for IRI was 68.2 (6)% vs erythropoietin-IRI 94.9 (8.9)% (P = 0.027), although by 36 h this was no longer significant, with values of 73.8 (12.7)% vs 95.9 (12)%, respectively (P = 0.23). Erythropoietin also significantly reduced the amount of cell death on histological analysis after 5 days of reperfusion, with a median (range) for IRI of 5.5 (1-45) vs erythropoietin-IRI of 1.5 (0-4) (P = 0.043). CONCLUSION: This study confirms the potential clinical applications of erythropoietin as a novel therapeutic agent in patients at risk of IRI.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the administration of erythropoietin at the time of ischaemic renal injury (IRI) inhibits apoptosis, enhances tubular epithelial regeneration and promotes renal functional recovery, as it does in rodent models, in a higher mammalian model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The model of IRI involved unilateral nephrectomy in pigs, followed a week later by renal artery occlusion for 1 h, followed by reperfusion for 5 days. Pigs were randomized to receive erythropoietin 5000 units/kg intravenously at the time of ischaemia, followed by 1000 units/kg subcutaneously daily, or no treatment (six pigs each). Renal function and structure were analysed; blood and urine were collected daily to determine serum creatinine level, blood ureanitrogen, and creatinine clearance. Animals were killed after 5 days to obtain the injured kidneys. The kidneys were examined histologically for evidence of cellular mitosis, apoptosis and necrosis. RESULTS:Erythropoietin significantly abrogated renal dysfunction after IRI compared with controls at 12 h after injury; the mean (sem) creatinine clearance (as a percentage of baseline) for IRI was 68.2 (6)% vs erythropoietin-IRI 94.9 (8.9)% (P = 0.027), although by 36 h this was no longer significant, with values of 73.8 (12.7)% vs 95.9 (12)%, respectively (P = 0.23). Erythropoietin also significantly reduced the amount of cell death on histological analysis after 5 days of reperfusion, with a median (range) for IRI of 5.5 (1-45) vs erythropoietin-IRI of 1.5 (0-4) (P = 0.043). CONCLUSION: This study confirms the potential clinical applications of erythropoietin as a novel therapeutic agent in patients at risk of IRI.
Authors: Ephrem O Olweny; Saad A Mir; Samuel K Park; Yung K Tan; Stephen Faddegon; Sara L Best; Cenk Gurbuz; Jeffrey A Cadeddu Journal: World J Urol Date: 2011-09-15 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: Šárka Matějková; Angelika Scheuerle; Florian Wagner; Oscar McCook; José Matallo; Michael Gröger; Andrea Seifritz; Bettina Stahl; Brigitta Vcelar; Enrico Calzia; Michael Georgieff; Peter Möller; Hubert Schelzig; Peter Radermacher; Florian Simon Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2013-01-05 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Oscar McCook; Michael Georgieff; Angelika Scheuerle; Peter Möller; Christoph Thiemermann; Peter Radermacher Journal: Crit Care Date: 2012-09-26 Impact factor: 9.097
Authors: Beatrice Coupes; Declan G de Freitas; Stephen A Roberts; Ian Read; Hany Riad; Paul E C Brenchley; Michael L Picton Journal: BMC Res Notes Date: 2015-02-03
Authors: Willem G van Rijt; Gertrude J Nieuwenhuijs-Moeke; Harry van Goor; Bente Jespersen; Petra J Ottens; Rutger J Ploeg; Henri G D Leuvenink Journal: J Transl Med Date: 2013-01-09 Impact factor: 5.531