A T N Tita1, B J Selwyn, D K Waller, A S Kapadia, S Dongmo. 1. Center for Research in Women's Health, Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35233, USA. alan.tita@obgyn.uab.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To identify the factors associated with important (> or =50%) variation in awareness and practice of evidence-based obstetric interventions in an African setting where we have previously reported poor awareness and use of evidence-based reproductive interventions. DESIGN: Cross-sectional analysis of data from our Reproductive Health Interventions Study. SETTING: North-west province, Cameroon, Africa. POPULATION: Health workers including obstetricians, other physicians, midwives, nurses and other staff providing reproductive care. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Prevalence ratios (PR) of uniform awareness and practice of four key evidence-based obstetric interventions from the World Health Organization Reproductive Health Library (WHO RHL): antiretrovirals to prevent mother-to-child transmission of HIV/AIDS, antenatal corticosteroids for prematurity, uterotonics to prevent postpartum haemorrhage and magnesium sulphate for seizure prophylaxis. METHODS: Comparisons of descriptive covariates, applying logistic regression to estimate independent relationships with awareness and use of evidence-based interventions. RESULTS: A total of 15.5% (50/322) of health workers were aware of all the four interventions while only 3.8% (12/312) reported optimal practice. Evidence-based awareness was strongly associated with practice (PR = 15.4; 96% CI: 4.3-55.0). Factors significantly associated with awareness were: attending continuing education, access to the WHO RHL, employment as an obstetrician/gynaecologist and working in autonomous military or National Insurance Fund facilities. Controlling for potential confounding, working as an obstetrician was associated with increased awareness (adjusted prevalence odds ratio [aPOR] = 8.3; 95% CI: 1.3-53.8) as was median work experience of 5-15 years (aPOR = 2.0; 95% CI: 1.0-3.8). Internet access was associated with increased practice (aPOR = 3.4; 95% CI: 1.0-11.8). Other potentially important variations were observed, although they did not attain statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: Several factors including obstetric training and continuous education positively influence evidence-based awareness and practice of key obstetric interventions. Confirmation and application of this information may enhance the effectiveness of programmes to improve maternal and perinatal outcomes.
OBJECTIVE: To identify the factors associated with important (> or =50%) variation in awareness and practice of evidence-based obstetric interventions in an African setting where we have previously reported poor awareness and use of evidence-based reproductive interventions. DESIGN: Cross-sectional analysis of data from our Reproductive Health Interventions Study. SETTING: North-west province, Cameroon, Africa. POPULATION: Health workers including obstetricians, other physicians, midwives, nurses and other staff providing reproductive care. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Prevalence ratios (PR) of uniform awareness and practice of four key evidence-based obstetric interventions from the World Health Organization Reproductive Health Library (WHO RHL): antiretrovirals to prevent mother-to-child transmission of HIV/AIDS, antenatal corticosteroids for prematurity, uterotonics to prevent postpartum haemorrhage and magnesium sulphate for seizure prophylaxis. METHODS: Comparisons of descriptive covariates, applying logistic regression to estimate independent relationships with awareness and use of evidence-based interventions. RESULTS: A total of 15.5% (50/322) of health workers were aware of all the four interventions while only 3.8% (12/312) reported optimal practice. Evidence-based awareness was strongly associated with practice (PR = 15.4; 96% CI: 4.3-55.0). Factors significantly associated with awareness were: attending continuing education, access to the WHO RHL, employment as an obstetrician/gynaecologist and working in autonomous military or National Insurance Fund facilities. Controlling for potential confounding, working as an obstetrician was associated with increased awareness (adjusted prevalence odds ratio [aPOR] = 8.3; 95% CI: 1.3-53.8) as was median work experience of 5-15 years (aPOR = 2.0; 95% CI: 1.0-3.8). Internet access was associated with increased practice (aPOR = 3.4; 95% CI: 1.0-11.8). Other potentially important variations were observed, although they did not attain statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: Several factors including obstetric training and continuous education positively influence evidence-based awareness and practice of key obstetric interventions. Confirmation and application of this information may enhance the effectiveness of programmes to improve maternal and perinatal outcomes.
Authors: Elizabeth M McClure; Joseph de Graft-Johnson; Alan H Jobe; Steve Wall; Marge Koblinsky; Allisyn Moran; Linda L Wright; Winifride Mwebesa; Marion Koso-Thomas; Robert L Goldenberg Journal: Int J Gynaecol Obstet Date: 2011-09-17 Impact factor: 3.561
Authors: Luisa A Wetta; Jeff M Szychowski; Samantha Seals; Melissa S Mancuso; Joseph R Biggio; Alan T N Tita Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2013-03-15 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Janet E Squires; Carole A Estabrooks; Hannah M O'Rourke; Petter Gustavsson; Christine V Newburn-Cook; Lars Wallin Journal: Implement Sci Date: 2011-07-27 Impact factor: 7.327