Literature DB >> 16955728

Working memory involvement in emotion-based processes underlying choosing advantageously.

Anna Pecchinenda1, Michael Dretsch, Paul Chapman.   

Abstract

The Iowa Gambling Task (IGT) is widely used to assess decision making under conditions of uncertainty in clinical as well as in nonclinical populations. However, there is still debate as to whether normal performance at this task relies on implicit, emotion-based processes that are independent of working memory. To clarify the role of working memory on normal performance on the IGT, participants performed the task under low or high working memory load. We used a modified version of the original task, in which the position of the four decks was randomized between trials. Results showed that only participants performing under low memory load significantly chose more advantageously halfway through the task. In addition, when comparing the number of cards chosen from the two decks with frequent losses, one advantageous and one disadvantageous, only participants performing under low memory load chose more cards from the advantageous deck. The present findings indicate that the processes underlying optimal advantageous performance on the IGT rely on working memory functions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16955728     DOI: 10.1027/1618-3169.53.3.191

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Psychol        ISSN: 1618-3169


  14 in total

1.  Working memory deficits affect risky decision-making in methamphetamine users with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.

Authors:  Nichole A Duarte; Steven Paul Woods; Alexandra Rooney; J Hampton Atkinson; Igor Grant
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  2012-02-02       Impact factor: 4.791

2.  Effects of working memory load, a history of conduct disorder, and sex on decision making in substance dependent individuals.

Authors:  Daniel J Fridberg; Kyle R Gerst; Peter R Finn
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2013-08-26       Impact factor: 4.492

3.  Maladaptive decision making and substance use outcomes in high-risk individuals: preliminary evidence for the role of 5-HTTLPR variation.

Authors:  Jessica W O'Brien; Sarah D Lichenstein; Shirley Y Hill
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol Drugs       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 2.582

4.  Iowa gambling task: there is more to consider than long-term outcome. Using a linear equation model to disentangle the impact of outcome and frequency of gains and losses.

Authors:  Annette Horstmann; Arno Villringer; Jane Neumann
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2012-05-14       Impact factor: 4.677

5.  Effects of working memory load on uncertain decision-making: evidence from the Iowa Gambling Task.

Authors:  Ji-Fang Cui; Ya Wang; Hai-Song Shi; Lu-Lu Liu; Xing-Jie Chen; Ying-He Chen
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-02-19

6.  Disadvantageous Deck Selection in the Iowa Gambling Task: The Effect of Cognitive Load.

Authors:  Melissa J Hawthorne; Benton H Pierce
Journal:  Eur J Psychol       Date:  2015-05-29

7.  Decision making as a predictor of first ecstasy use: a prospective study.

Authors:  Thelma Schilt; Anneke E Goudriaan; Maarten W Koeter; Wim van den Brink; Ben Schmand
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2008-11-20       Impact factor: 4.530

8.  Emotional decision-making and its dissociable components in schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder: a behavioural and MRI investigation.

Authors:  Preethi Premkumar; Dominic Fannon; Elizabeth Kuipers; Andrew Simmons; Sophia Frangou; Veena Kumari
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2008-02-07       Impact factor: 3.139

9.  Dissociable processes underlying decisions in the Iowa Gambling Task: a new integrative framework.

Authors:  Andrea Stocco; Danilo Fum; Antonio Napoli
Journal:  Behav Brain Funct       Date:  2009-01-02       Impact factor: 3.759

10.  Working memory in the processing of the Iowa Gambling Task: an individual differences approach.

Authors:  Virginie Bagneux; Noémylle Thomassin; Corentin Gonthier; Jean-Luc Roulin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.