OBJECTIVES: To examine the effectiveness of depression screening and the Engagement Interview Protocol (EIP) in identifying and engaging in treatment depressed Chinese Americans in a primary care setting. METHODS: Chinese American patients who attended a primary care clinic between 15 September, 2004 and 14 September, 2005 were screened for depression using the Chinese Bilingual version of the Patient Health Questionnaire (CB-PHQ-9). Patients who screened positive (CB-PHQ-9>or=15) were evaluated using the EIP to establish psychiatric diagnosis and to engage patients in treatment. RESULTS: Three thousand eight hundred and twelve patients completed the CB-PHQ-9, of which 113 (3.2%) screened positive for MDD. Among those screening positive, six (5.3%) had been receiving psychiatric treatment for depression, 57 (50%) declined to receive a psychiatric interview or were unable to be contacted, and 50 (44%) agreed to be interviewed with the EIP. Out of the 50 patients interviewed, 44 (88%) had their MDD diagnosis confirmed; among them, 41 (93%) agreed to receive treatment for depression and three (7%) declined intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Under-recognition and under-treatment of depressed Chinese Americans in primary care settings continue to be prevalent. Recognition of depression can be enhanced by using the brief CB-PHQ-9 to screen for depression. Half of the Chinese Americans who screened positive for MDD declined evaluation by a mental health professional. Most of the depressed Chinese Americans who were evaluated agreed to receive treatment. Enhanced cultural sensitivity with the use of the EIP in psychiatric assessment may have contributed to the success in engaging depressed Chinese Americans in treatment. Copyright (c) 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
OBJECTIVES: To examine the effectiveness of depression screening and the Engagement Interview Protocol (EIP) in identifying and engaging in treatment depressed Chinese Americans in a primary care setting. METHODS: Chinese American patients who attended a primary care clinic between 15 September, 2004 and 14 September, 2005 were screened for depression using the Chinese Bilingual version of the Patient Health Questionnaire (CB-PHQ-9). Patients who screened positive (CB-PHQ-9>or=15) were evaluated using the EIP to establish psychiatric diagnosis and to engage patients in treatment. RESULTS: Three thousand eight hundred and twelve patients completed the CB-PHQ-9, of which 113 (3.2%) screened positive for MDD. Among those screening positive, six (5.3%) had been receiving psychiatric treatment for depression, 57 (50%) declined to receive a psychiatric interview or were unable to be contacted, and 50 (44%) agreed to be interviewed with the EIP. Out of the 50 patients interviewed, 44 (88%) had their MDD diagnosis confirmed; among them, 41 (93%) agreed to receive treatment for depression and three (7%) declined intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Under-recognition and under-treatment of depressed Chinese Americans in primary care settings continue to be prevalent. Recognition of depression can be enhanced by using the brief CB-PHQ-9 to screen for depression. Half of the Chinese Americans who screened positive for MDD declined evaluation by a mental health professional. Most of the depressed Chinese Americans who were evaluated agreed to receive treatment. Enhanced cultural sensitivity with the use of the EIP in psychiatric assessment may have contributed to the success in engaging depressed Chinese Americans in treatment. Copyright (c) 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Authors: Steven Z Chao; Brandy R Matthews; Jennifer S Yokoyama; Ngan Betty Lai; Hilary Ong; Marian Tse; Runfen Frances Yuan; Amy Lin; Joel Kramer; Kristine Yaffe; John Kornak; Bruce L Miller; Howard J Rosen Journal: Am J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2013-09-08 Impact factor: 4.105
Authors: Nhi-Ha T Trinh; C A Bedoya; Trina E Chang; Katherine Flaherty; Maurizio Fava; Albert Yeung Journal: BMC Psychiatry Date: 2011-10-13 Impact factor: 3.630
Authors: Albert Yeung; Gregory Feldman; Paola Pedrelli; Kate Hails; Maurizio Fava; Tracy Reyes; James C Mundt Journal: J Nerv Ment Dis Date: 2012-08 Impact factor: 2.254