Literature DB >> 16954787

Patch testing: pitfalls and performance.

Christen M Mowad1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Contact dermatitis is a common disease process that includes allergic and irritant contact dermatitis. The gold standard for diagnosing allergic contact dermatitis, a type IV delayed hypersensitivity reaction, is patch testing. Patch testing is not a difficult procedure, however, there are several critical components that determine the success of the test: having an appropriate level of suspicion for the diagnosis of allergic contact dermatitis, an adequate threshold for patch testing, the necessary experience to properly interpret the results and to determine their relevance, and the ability to thoroughly educate the patient about the condition. RECENT
FINDINGS: Research shows that patch testing practices differ among individuals and specialties. The level of patch testing education, interest in, and experience with, the procedure can affect the results of the test. Some of these practice differences and how they affect the outcome of patch testing are highlighted.
SUMMARY: Physicians' knowledge and experience with patch testing, their level of interest and access to allergens will determine the performance of this test, the reliability of the results and the benefits gained from this procedure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16954787     DOI: 10.1097/01.all.0000244794.03239.8e

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol        ISSN: 1473-6322


  6 in total

Review 1.  Early immune events in the induction of allergic contact dermatitis.

Authors:  Daniel H Kaplan; Botond Z Igyártó; Anthony A Gaspari
Journal:  Nat Rev Immunol       Date:  2012-01-13       Impact factor: 53.106

2.  Novel metal allergy patch test using metal nanoballs.

Authors:  Tomoko Sugiyama; Motohiro Uo; Takahiro Wada; Toshio Hongo; Daisuke Omagari; Kazuo Komiyama; Hitoshi Sasaki; Heishichiro Takahashi; Mikio Kusama; Yoshiyuki Mori
Journal:  J Nanobiotechnology       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 10.435

3.  A method to visualize transdermal nickel permeation in mouse skin using a nickel allergy patch.

Authors:  Tomoko Sugiyama; Motohiro Uo; Takahiro Wada; Toshio Hongo; Daisuke Omagari; Kazuo Komiyama; Masakazu Oikawa; Mikio Kusama; Yoshiyuki Mori
Journal:  Biomed Mater Eng       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 1.300

Review 4.  Unmet diagnostic needs in contact oral mucosal allergies.

Authors:  Paola Lucia Minciullo; Giovanni Paolino; Maddalena Vacca; Sebastiano Gangemi; Eustachio Nettis
Journal:  Clin Mol Allergy       Date:  2016-09-01

5.  Hypersensitivity reactions to metal implants: laboratory options.

Authors:  Anna Maria Carossino; Christian Carulli; Simone Ciuffi; Roberto Carossino; Giorgia Donata Zappoli Thyrion; Roberto Zonefrati; Massimo Innocenti; Maria Luisa Brandi
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2016-11-23       Impact factor: 2.362

6.  Non-heat inactivated autologous serum increases accuracy of in vitro CFSE lymphocyte proliferation test (LPT) for nickel.

Authors:  Niels P J de Graaf; Hetty J Bontkes; Sanne Roffel; Cornelis J Kleverlaan; Thomas Rustemeyer; Sue Gibbs; Albert J Feilzer
Journal:  Clin Exp Allergy       Date:  2020-04-14       Impact factor: 5.018

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.