Literature DB >> 16953850

What do obstetricians think about media influences on their patients?

Bronny Handfield1, Sue Turnbull, Robin J Bell.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients are playing an increasingly active role in decision-making about their care and are becoming increasingly informed about their health. Traditionally, sources of information about pregnancy and birth were family and friends and, in more recent times, antenatal classes. Evidence suggests that the media, particularly the Internet, is an increasingly influential source of information about illness and health. AIMS: The aim of this study was to survey Australian Fellows of the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RANZCOG) about their perceptions of sources of patient information about pregnancy and birth, particularly the media and the Internet.
METHODS: A two-page survey with a reply paid envelope was sent to all Australian Fellows of RANZCOG. Most questions only allowed a selection of prespecified categorical options. Some questions allowed open-ended replies that were assessed using thematic analysis.
RESULTS: RANZCOG fellows thought that family and friends were the most important source of information for patients about pregnancy and birth followed by formal antenatal education, although they ranked the influence of the Internet above that of free-to-air television. Responses suggested that women in both the public and the private sectors were accessing the Internet.
CONCLUSIONS: Fellows felt that their patients are actively involved in decisions about their care during pregnancy and birth and that the media influences their knowledge and attitudes. The Internet appears to have an increasingly important role in providing women with information. Obstetricians need to be aware of what their patients are accessing on the Internet.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16953850     DOI: 10.1111/j.1479-828X.2006.00621.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol        ISSN: 0004-8666            Impact factor:   2.100


  6 in total

1.  Communication Intervention Using Digital Technology to Facilitate Informed Choices at Childbirth in the Context of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Carmen Simone Grilo Diniz; Ana Carolina Arruda Franzon; Beatriz Fioretti-Foschi; Denise Yoshie Niy; Livia Sanches Pedrilio; Edson Amaro; João Ricardo Sato
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2021-05-21

2.  Portrayal of caesarean section in Brazilian women's magazines: 20 year review.

Authors:  Maria Regina Torloni; Silvia Daher; Ana Pilar Betrán; Mariana Widmer; Pilar Montilla; Joao Paulo Souza; Mario Merialdi
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2011-01-25

Review 3.  "Is it realistic?" the portrayal of pregnancy and childbirth in the media.

Authors:  Ann Luce; Marilyn Cash; Vanora Hundley; Helen Cheyne; Edwin van Teijlingen; Catherine Angell
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2016-02-29       Impact factor: 3.007

4.  Qualitative website analysis of information on birth after caesarean section.

Authors:  Valerie L Peddie; Natalie Whitelaw; Grant P Cumming; Siladitya Bhattacharya; Mairead Black
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 3.007

Review 5.  What do popular Spanish women's magazines say about caesarean section? A 21-year survey.

Authors:  M R Torloni; B Campos Mansilla; M Merialdi; A P Betrán
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 6.531

6.  Mass media campaigns to reduce unnecessary caesarean sections: a systematic review.

Authors:  Maria Regina Torloni; Vanessa Brizuela; Ana Pilar Betran
Journal:  BMJ Glob Health       Date:  2020-02-26
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.