Literature DB >> 16952821

Use of sequential electrical nerve stimuli (SENS) for location of the sciatic nerve and lumbar plexus.

William F Urmey1, Paolo Grossi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Conventional electrical stimulation has been done by continuous adjustment of current amplitude at a single, set pulse duration (conventionally, 0.1 ms). This study evaluated a novel technique for nerve location by utilization of a peripheral-nerve stimulator (PNS) programmed to deliver sequential electrical nerve stimuli (SENS). A repeating series of alternating sequential pulses of 0.1, 0.3, and 1.0 ms at 1/3-second period intervals between pulses were generated so that at a greater distance from the nerve, only higher-duration pulses would stimulate the targeted nerve and result in 1 or 2 motor responses (MR) per second. Three MR per second at 0.5 mA or less signified the conventional endpoint for nerve location (</=0.5 mA, 0.1 ms) because that value indicated that the 0.1-ms pulse was effective. The conventional 0.1-ms pulse served as a built-in control to which the SENS was compared.
METHODS: Sixteen sciatic/psoas blocks were performed on 8 patients. Nerve location was by SENS, with an 80-mm block needle. Needle advance began at 1.0 mA until MR. If 1 or 2 MR/s occurred, the needle was advanced until 3 MR/s were obtained. When 3 MR/s occurred at 0.5 mA or less, needle position was fixed (final position), and mA further decreased until MR disappeared. Two digital video cameras separately recorded needle depth and MR for analysis. Final needle position was designated as zero, and distance was calculated relative to it.
RESULTS: In 12 of 16 of the performed blocks, SENS resulted in advanced notification (1 or 2 MR/s), which yielded additional visual feedback compared with control before final nerve location and, thus, increased range. In 15 of 16 blocks, MR did not disappear, once elicited, through final needle location.
CONCLUSIONS: SENS resulted in increased sensitivity without compromising specificity of nerve location.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16952821     DOI: 10.1016/j.rapm.2006.06.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reg Anesth Pain Med        ISSN: 1098-7339            Impact factor:   6.288


  4 in total

Review 1.  Upper extremity regional anesthesia: essentials of our current understanding, 2008.

Authors:  Joseph M Neal; J C Gerancher; James R Hebl; Brian M Ilfeld; Colin J L McCartney; Carlo D Franco; Quinn H Hogan
Journal:  Reg Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2009 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.288

2.  Somatosensory evoked potential from S1 nerve root stimulation.

Authors:  Xiao-Dong Wu; Yu Zhu; Wen-Jun Chen; Xiang Jin; Nicholas Tsai; Huang-Yuan Huang; Jian-Yuan Jiang; Dong-Qing Zhu; Pei-Ying Li; Robert Weber; Wen Yuan; Hua-Jiang Chen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-05-10       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  [Localization of peripheral nerves. Success and safety with electrical nerve stimulation].

Authors:  M Neuburger; U Schwemmer; T Volk; W Gogarten; P Kessler; T Steinfeldt
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 1.041

4.  ASRA Practice Advisory on Neurologic Complications in Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine.

Authors:  Joseph M Neal; Christopher M Bernards; Admir Hadzic; James R Hebl; Quinn H Hogan; Terese T Horlocker; Lorri A Lee; James P Rathmell; Eric J Sorenson; Santhanam Suresh; Denise J Wedel
Journal:  Reg Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2008 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 6.288

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.