Joel J Heidelbaugh1, John M Inadomi. 1. Department of Family Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Although administration of stress ulcer prophylaxis (SUP) has been recommended for specific patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) setting, this practice has been extrapolated to care of non-ICU patients without evidence to support need or efficacy. AIMS: To examine the practice of SUP in non-ICU patients in a university hospital setting, with specific attention to resource utilization. METHODS: Retrospective chart review of adult non-ICU admissions to one family medicine and five general internal medicine teaching services over a consecutive 4-month period. Proportion of patients prescribed SUP was ascertained after exclusion of patients admitted on antisecretory therapy (AST) or prescribed AST for non-SUP indications. Annual cost estimates were calculated assuming full compliance. RESULTS: Of 1,769 patient admissions, 22% received SUP and 54% of these were discharged home on AST. None of these patients met evidence-based criteria for appropriate SUP. Inpatient SUP cost Dollars 11,024 over the 4 months of the study (Dollars 44,096 annually), and outpatient costs based on discharge prescriptions were Dollars 16,924 (Dollars 67,695 annually), yielding a total cost expenditure of Dollars 27,948 (Dollars 111,791 annually). CONCLUSION: SUP is overutilized in the non-ICU setting, and patients are often discharged unnecessarily on AST, resulting in significant cost expenditure. Interventions to ensure appropriate use of SUP should decrease resource expenditures without detrimental impact on quality of care.
BACKGROUND: Although administration of stress ulcer prophylaxis (SUP) has been recommended for specific patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) setting, this practice has been extrapolated to care of non-ICU patients without evidence to support need or efficacy. AIMS: To examine the practice of SUP in non-ICU patients in a university hospital setting, with specific attention to resource utilization. METHODS: Retrospective chart review of adult non-ICU admissions to one family medicine and five general internal medicine teaching services over a consecutive 4-month period. Proportion of patients prescribed SUP was ascertained after exclusion of patients admitted on antisecretory therapy (AST) or prescribed AST for non-SUP indications. Annual cost estimates were calculated assuming full compliance. RESULTS: Of 1,769 patient admissions, 22% received SUP and 54% of these were discharged home on AST. None of these patients met evidence-based criteria for appropriate SUP. Inpatient SUP cost Dollars 11,024 over the 4 months of the study (Dollars 44,096 annually), and outpatient costs based on discharge prescriptions were Dollars 16,924 (Dollars 67,695 annually), yielding a total cost expenditure of Dollars 27,948 (Dollars 111,791 annually). CONCLUSION: SUP is overutilized in the non-ICU setting, and patients are often discharged unnecessarily on AST, resulting in significant cost expenditure. Interventions to ensure appropriate use of SUP should decrease resource expenditures without detrimental impact on quality of care.
Authors: Jeffrey C Munson; Peter M Wahl; Gregory Daniel; Stephen E Kimmel; Sean Hennessy Journal: Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf Date: 2012-01-25 Impact factor: 2.890