Literature DB >> 16950654

Comparison of two email-delivered, pedometer-based interventions to promote walking among insufficiently active women.

Mary K Dinger1, Kristiann C Heesch, Gina Cipriani, Mandy Qualls.   

Abstract

Research on the effect of email-delivered, pedometer-based interventions on walking behavior and transtheoretical model (TTM) constructs is lacking. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of two email-delivered, pedometer-based interventions designed to increase walking and TTM construct scores among insufficiently active women. Participants were randomly assigned to one of two 6-week intervention groups. Both groups wore pedometers, submitted step logs, and received weekly email reminders. One group also received in the emails suggested strategies based on TTM for increasing physical activity. Of the 74 women who began the study, 56 (age=41.5+/-7.6 years; body mass index=31.2+/-6.6kg/m(2); 86% Caucasian) completed the International Physical Activity Questionnaire and TTM questionnaires at baseline and post-intervention. Participants in both groups combined increased weekly time spent walking (p=0.002) and their scores on TTM cognitive processes, behavioral processes, pros, and cons changed (p< or =0.001) from baseline to post-intervention. The changes in walking and TTM scores did not differ between groups (p>0.05). The results of this study indicate that email-delivered, pedometer-based interventions may impact walking and most TTM scores among insufficiently active women. Although preliminary, the findings provide additional evidence that this low-cost method of intervening may be an effective approach to combat physical inactivity in women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16950654     DOI: 10.1016/j.jsams.2006.07.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sci Med Sport        ISSN: 1878-1861            Impact factor:   4.319


  15 in total

1.  [Development and Effects of Smartphone App-Based Walking Exercise Program for Taxi Drivers: Based on Bandura's Self Efficacy Theory].

Authors:  Yun Ha Choi; Min Jeong Chae
Journal:  J Korean Acad Nurs       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 0.984

2.  Internet-Based Physical Activity Interventions.

Authors:  Rodney P Joseph; Nefertiti H Durant; Tanya J Benitez; Dorothy W Pekmezi
Journal:  Am J Lifestyle Med       Date:  2014-01

Review 3.  Recruiting participants to walking intervention studies: a systematic review.

Authors:  Charlie E Foster; Graham Brennan; Anne Matthews; Chloe McAdam; Claire Fitzsimons; Nanette Mutrie
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 6.457

4.  Promoting Lifestyle Physical Activity: Experiences with the First Step Program.

Authors:  Catrine Tudor-Locke
Journal:  Am J Lifestyle Med       Date:  2009-07-01

Review 5.  Using electronic/computer interventions to promote physical activity.

Authors:  B H Marcus; J T Ciccolo; C N Sciamanna
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2008-12-03       Impact factor: 13.800

6.  Mediators of physical activity behaviour change among adult non-clinical populations: a review update.

Authors:  Ryan E Rhodes; Leila A Pfaeffli
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2010-05-11       Impact factor: 6.457

7.  Promoting walking among office employees - evaluation of a randomized controlled intervention with pedometers and e-mail messages.

Authors:  Minna Aittasalo; Marjo Rinne; Matti Pasanen; Katriina Kukkonen-Harjula; Tommi Vasankari
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 3.295

8.  Testing a workplace physical activity intervention: a cluster randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Rosemary R C McEachan; Rebecca J Lawton; Cath Jackson; Mark Conner; David M Meads; Robert M West
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2011-04-11       Impact factor: 6.457

Review 9.  Periodic prompts and reminders in health promotion and health behavior interventions: systematic review.

Authors:  Jillian P Fry; Roni A Neff
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2009-05-14       Impact factor: 5.428

10.  WALK 2.0 - using Web 2.0 applications to promote health-related physical activity: a randomised controlled trial protocol.

Authors:  Gregory S Kolt; Richard R Rosenkranz; Trevor N Savage; Anthony J Maeder; Corneel Vandelanotte; Mitch J Duncan; Cristina M Caperchione; Rhys Tague; Cindy Hooker; W Kerry Mummery
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2013-05-03       Impact factor: 3.295

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.