BACKGROUND: Although there are many structural neuroimaging studies of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in children, there are inconsistencies across studies and no consensus regarding which brain regions show the most robust area or volumetric reductions relative to control subjects. Our goal was to statistically analyze structural imaging data via a meta-analysis to help resolve these issues. METHODS: We searched the MEDLINE and PsycINFO databases through January 2005. Studies must have been written in English, used magnetic resonance imaging, and presented the means and standard deviations of regions assessed. Data were extracted by one of the authors and verified independently by another author. RESULTS: Analyses were performed using STATA with metan, metabias, and metainf programs. A meta-analysis including all regions across all studies indicated global reductions for ADHD subjects compared with control subjects, standardized mean difference=.408, p<.001. Regions most frequently assessed and showing the largest differences included cerebellar regions, the splenium of the corpus callosum, total and right cerebral volume, and right caudate. Several frontal regions assessed in only two studies also showed large significant differences. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis provides a quantitative analysis of neuroanatomical abnormalities in ADHD and information that can be used to guide future studies.
BACKGROUND: Although there are many structural neuroimaging studies of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in children, there are inconsistencies across studies and no consensus regarding which brain regions show the most robust area or volumetric reductions relative to control subjects. Our goal was to statistically analyze structural imaging data via a meta-analysis to help resolve these issues. METHODS: We searched the MEDLINE and PsycINFO databases through January 2005. Studies must have been written in English, used magnetic resonance imaging, and presented the means and standard deviations of regions assessed. Data were extracted by one of the authors and verified independently by another author. RESULTS: Analyses were performed using STATA with metan, metabias, and metainf programs. A meta-analysis including all regions across all studies indicated global reductions for ADHD subjects compared with control subjects, standardized mean difference=.408, p<.001. Regions most frequently assessed and showing the largest differences included cerebellar regions, the splenium of the corpus callosum, total and right cerebral volume, and right caudate. Several frontal regions assessed in only two studies also showed large significant differences. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis provides a quantitative analysis of neuroanatomical abnormalities in ADHD and information that can be used to guide future studies.
Authors: L J S Schweren; C A Hartman; M P Zwiers; D J Heslenfeld; D van der Meer; B Franke; J Oosterlaan; J K Buitelaar; P J Hoekstra Journal: Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 2014-11-14 Impact factor: 4.785
Authors: Eve M Valera; Rebecca M C Spencer; Thomas A Zeffiro; Nikos Makris; Thomas J Spencer; Stephen V Faraone; Joseph Biederman; Larry J Seidman Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2010-08-15 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: Kelly Anne Barnes; James H Howard; Darlene V Howard; Laura Kenealy; Chandan J Vaidya Journal: Dev Neuropsychol Date: 2010 Impact factor: 2.253
Authors: T Sigi Hale; Susan L Smalley; Jeff Dang; Grant Hanada; James Macion; James T McCracken; James J McGough; Sandra K Loo Journal: J Psychiatr Res Date: 2009-12-16 Impact factor: 4.791