BACKGROUND: Sustained anxiety can be modeled using context conditioning, which can be studied in a virtual reality environment. Unpredictable stressors increase context conditioning in animals. This study examined context conditioning to predictable and unpredictable shocks in humans using behavioral avoidance, potentiated startle, and subjective reports of anxiety. METHODS: Subjects were guided through three virtual rooms (no-shock, predictable, unpredictable contexts). Eight-sec duration colored lights served as conditioned stimuli (CS). During acquisition, no shock was administered in the no-shock context. Shocks were paired with the CS in the predictable context and were administered randomly in the unpredictable context. No shock was administered during extinction. Startle stimuli were delivered during CS and between CS to assess cued and context conditioning, respectively. To assess avoidance, subjects freely navigated into two of the three contexts to retrieve money. RESULTS: Startle between CS was potentiated in the unpredictable context compared to the two other contexts. Following acquisition, subjects showed a strong preference for the no-shock context and avoidance of the unpredictable context. CONCLUSIONS: Consistent with animal data, context conditioning is increased by unpredictability. These data support virtual reality as a tool to extend research on physiological and behavioral signs of fear and anxiety in humans.
BACKGROUND:Sustained anxiety can be modeled using context conditioning, which can be studied in a virtual reality environment. Unpredictable stressors increase context conditioning in animals. This study examined context conditioning to predictable and unpredictable shocks in humans using behavioral avoidance, potentiated startle, and subjective reports of anxiety. METHODS: Subjects were guided through three virtual rooms (no-shock, predictable, unpredictable contexts). Eight-sec duration colored lights served as conditioned stimuli (CS). During acquisition, no shock was administered in the no-shock context. Shocks were paired with the CS in the predictable context and were administered randomly in the unpredictable context. No shock was administered during extinction. Startle stimuli were delivered during CS and between CS to assess cued and context conditioning, respectively. To assess avoidance, subjects freely navigated into two of the three contexts to retrieve money. RESULTS:Startle between CS was potentiated in the unpredictable context compared to the two other contexts. Following acquisition, subjects showed a strong preference for the no-shock context and avoidance of the unpredictable context. CONCLUSIONS: Consistent with animal data, context conditioning is increased by unpredictability. These data support virtual reality as a tool to extend research on physiological and behavioral signs of fear and anxiety in humans.
Authors: Manuel Kuhn; Jan Haaker; Evelyn Glotzbach-Schoon; Dirk Schümann; Marta Andreatta; Marie-Luise Mechias; Karolina Raczka; Nina Gartmann; Christian Büchel; Andreas Mühlberger; Paul Pauli; Andreas Reif; Raffael Kalisch; Tina B Lonsdorf Journal: Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci Date: 2016-01-08 Impact factor: 3.436
Authors: Joseph F McGuire; Scott P Orr; Joey K-Y Essoe; James T McCracken; Eric A Storch; John Piacentini Journal: Expert Rev Neurother Date: 2016-06-27 Impact factor: 4.618
Authors: Evelyn Glotzbach-Schoon; Regina Tadda; Marta Andreatta; Christian Tröger; Heike Ewald; Christian Grillon; Paul Pauli; Andreas Mühlberger Journal: Biol Psychol Date: 2013-02-04 Impact factor: 3.251
Authors: Nathaniel G Harnett; Joshua R Shumen; Pooja A Wagle; Kimberly H Wood; Muriah D Wheelock; James H Baños; David C Knight Journal: Neurobiol Learn Mem Date: 2016-09-28 Impact factor: 2.877
Authors: Christian Grillon; Shmuel Lissek; Stephanie Rabin; Dana McDowell; Sharone Dvir; Daniel S Pine Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2008-03-17 Impact factor: 18.112