Literature DB >> 16950184

Usefulness of atrioventricular delay optimization using Doppler assessment of mitral inflow in patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Navin Kedia1, Kenneth Ng, Carolyn Apperson-Hansen, Chaohui Wang, Patrick Tchou, Bruce L Wilkoff, Richard A Grimm.   

Abstract

This study evaluated the utility of atrioventricular (AV) optimization using Doppler echocardiography in patients who undergo cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). AV optimization in patients who undergo CRT is performed inconsistently, with few data supporting its utility. Data were collected from 215 patients in New York Heart Association class III or IV heart failure (66% ischemic) who underwent AV optimization <30 days after implantation from 1999 to 2003. All patients arrived with AV delay programmed at the time of their CRT procedures (100 to 120 ms). AV delay was optimized using Doppler mitral inflow data to target stage I diastolic filling. Baseline clinical characteristics, AV delay, and diastolic functional stage were recorded. The mean follow-up period was 23 months. Five hundred patients underwent CRT, 215 of whom underwent AV optimization <30 days after implantation. Baseline mean age was 66 +/- 12 years, left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction 19 +/- 8%, LV end-diastolic dimension 6.5 +/- 1 cm, LV end-systolic dimension 5.5 +/- 1 cm, QRS duration 166 +/- 27 ms, and time to AV optimization 2.5 +/- 4 days. Baseline and final AV delay means were 120 +/- 25 and 135 +/- 40 ms, respectively (p = 0.0001). In 40% of patients (86 of 215), final AV delay settings were >140 ms. Left atrial diameter and AV block predicted patients in whom AV delay settings >140 ms were optimal. There was no difference in mortality in patients with final AV delays of >140 ms. In conclusion, AV optimization in patients who underwent CRT resulted in final AV delay settings of >140 ms in 40% of patients. AV delay optimization based on Doppler echocardiographic determination of optimal diastolic filling is useful and safe in patients who undergo CRT.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16950184     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2006.04.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  16 in total

Review 1.  Effects of cardiac resynchronization therapy on ventricular remodeling.

Authors:  Hind W Rahmouni; James N Kirkpatrick; Martin G St John Sutton
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2008-03

2.  Echocardiography versus intracardiac electrocardiography-based optimization for cardiac resynchronization therapy : a comparative clinical long-term trial.

Authors:  C J Jensen; A Liadski; M Bell; C K Naber; O Bruder; G V Sabin; B Küpper; H Wieneke
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 1.443

Review 3.  Non-response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy.

Authors:  Syed Yaseen Naqvi; Anas Jawaid; Ilan Goldenberg; Valentina Kutyifa
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2018-10

Review 4.  Clinical, laboratory, and pacing predictors of CRT response.

Authors:  Jagdesh Kandala; Robert K Altman; Mi Young Park; Jagmeet P Singh
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2012-02-24       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 5.  State-of-the-art narrative review: multimodality imaging in electrophysiology and cardiac device therapies.

Authors:  Balint Laczay; Divyang Patel; Richard Grimm; Bo Xu
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2021-06

Review 6.  Doppler echocardiographic methods for optimization of the atrioventricular delay during cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Alan D Waggoner; Lisa de las Fuentes; Victor G Davila-Roman
Journal:  Echocardiography       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 1.724

7.  Non-invasive determination of the optimized atrioventricular delay in patients with implanted biventricular pacing devices.

Authors:  Thomas Deneke; Thomas Lawo; Stefan von Dryander; Peter Hubert Grewe; Alfried Germing; Eduard Gorr; Peter Hubben; Andreas Mugge; Dong-In Shin; Bernd Lemke
Journal:  Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J       Date:  2010-02-01

8.  Recent advances in the application of computational mechanics to the diagnosis and treatment of cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  Juan C Del Alamo; Alison L Marsden; Juan C Lasheras
Journal:  Rev Esp Cardiol       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 4.753

9.  The Contemporary Role of Echocardiography in Improving Patient Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy.

Authors:  John Gorcsan; Josef J Marek; Tetsuari Onishi
Journal:  Curr Cardiovasc Imaging Rep       Date:  2012-12

Review 10.  Cardiac resynchronization in 2008: an echo approach.

Authors:  John Gorcsan
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 2.931

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.