Literature DB >> 16950145

Single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography in lung cancer and malignant lymphoma.

Orazio Schillaci1.   

Abstract

In nuclear oncology, despite the fast-growing diffusion of (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET), single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) studies can still play an useful clinical role in several applications. The main limitation of SPECT imaging with tumor-seeking agents is the lack of the structural delineation of the pathologic processes they detect; this drawback sometimes renders SPECT interpretation difficult and can diminish its diagnostic accuracy. Fusion with morphological studies can overcome this limitation by giving an anatomical map to scintigraphic data. In the past, software-based fusion of independently performed SPECT and CT images proved to be time-consuming and impractical for routine use. The recent development of dual-modality integrated imaging systems that provide functional (SPECT) and anatomical (CT) images in the same scanning session, with the acquired images coregistered by means of the hardware, has opened a new era in this field. The first reports indicate that SPECT/CT is very useful in cancer imaging because it is able to provide further information of clinical value in several cases. In SPECT, studies of lung cancer and malignant lymphomas using different radiopharmaceutical, hybrid images are of value in providing the correct localization of tumor sites, with a precise detection of the involved organs, and the definition of their functional status, and in allowing the exclusion of disease in sites of physiologic tracer uptake. Therefore, in lung cancer and lymphomas, hybrid SPECT/CT can play a role in the diagnosis of the primary tumor, in the staging of the disease, in the follow-up, in the monitoring of therapy, in the detection of recurrence, and in dosimetric estimations for target radionuclide therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16950145     DOI: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2006.05.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Nucl Med        ISSN: 0001-2998            Impact factor:   4.446


  5 in total

1.  Is PET always an advantage versus planar and SPECT imaging?

Authors:  Giuliano Mariani; Laura Bruselli; Adriano Duatti
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 2.  A review on the clinical uses of SPECT/CT.

Authors:  Giuliano Mariani; Laura Bruselli; Torsten Kuwert; Edmund E Kim; Albert Flotats; Ora Israel; Maurizio Dondi; Naoyuki Watanabe
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2010-02-25       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 3.  Imaging to study solid tumour origin and progression: lessons from research and clinical oncology.

Authors:  Stefania Raimondo; Giovanni Zito
Journal:  Immunol Cell Biol       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 5.126

Review 4.  Molecular imaging in therapeutic efficacy assessment of targeted therapy for nonsmall cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Yanni Hu; Mei Tian; Hong Zhang
Journal:  J Biomed Biotechnol       Date:  2012-03-21

Review 5.  Molecular magnetic resonance imaging in cancer.

Authors:  Mohammad Haris; Santosh K Yadav; Arshi Rizwan; Anup Singh; Ena Wang; Hari Hariharan; Ravinder Reddy; Francesco M Marincola
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2015-09-23       Impact factor: 5.531

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.