Literature DB >> 16949933

Mucin core polypeptide expression in the progression of neoplasia in Barrett's esophagus.

Jonathan N Glickman1, Patricia L Blount, Carissa A Sanchez, David S Cowan, V Jon Wongsurawat, Brian J Reid, Robert D Odze.   

Abstract

We have previously demonstrated a specific pattern of mucin (MUC) core polypeptide expression in Barrett's esophagus (BE) characterized by MUC1 and MUC6 positivity in goblet cells in a proportion of cases. The aim of this study was to determine the pattern of MUC expression associated with the development and progression of dysplasia in BE. Endoscopic mucosal biopsies from 35 patients with BE (10 with no dysplasia, 6 with indefinite for dysplasia, 12 with low-grade dysplasia [LGD], and 7 biopsies with high-grade dysplasia [HGD]) were immunostained (ABC method) with antibodies against MUC1, MUC2, MUC3, MUC5AC, and MUC6. The extent and pattern of staining for each marker was evaluated in intestinalized Barrett's epithelium and in the various grades of dysplasia. For cases with dysplasia, staining was evaluated separately in nondysplastic epithelium adjacent to (<1 cm) and distant from (>2 cm) areas of dysplasia. In nondysplastic BE, MUC1, MUC2, MUC3, MUC5AC, and MUC6 stained 40%, 100%, 100%, 100%, and 90% of cases, respectively, in goblet or nongoblet columnar epithelium. With the progression of dysplasia (from metaplasia to indefinite, LGD and HGD), there was a significant decrease in expression of MUC1, MUC2, and MUC3, and alterations in the staining patterns of MUC5 and MUC6. In fact, MUC1 and MUC3 were entirely absent from all cases of HGD. Interestingly, BE-associated adenocarcinomas showed an MUC phenotype distinct from that of HGD, with expression of MUC1 and MUC3 in 47% and 67% of cases, and expression of MUC1 in a membranous pattern. There was no significant difference in MUC staining in nondysplastic BE between patients with and without dysplasia. Alterations in MUC expression occur in the progression of dysplasia in BE. However, none of these markers helps identify a subgroup of patients at increased risk for neoplasia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16949933     DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2006.03.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Pathol        ISSN: 0046-8177            Impact factor:   3.466


  19 in total

1.  Significance of paneth cell metaplasia in Barrett esophagus: a morphologic and clinicopathologic study.

Authors:  Wei Chen; Wendy L Frankel; Kevin M Cronley; Lianbo Yu; Xiaoping Zhou; Martha M Yearsley
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 2.493

2.  The role of mucin in GERD and its complications.

Authors:  Yaron Niv; Ronnie Fass
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2011-11-08       Impact factor: 46.802

3.  New strategies in Barrett's esophagus: integrating clonal evolutionary theory with clinical management.

Authors:  Brian J Reid; Rumen Kostadinov; Carlo C Maley
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2011-04-15       Impact factor: 12.531

4.  Development and characterization of an organotypic model of Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  Rachelle E Kosoff; Kristin L Gardiner; Lauren M F Merlo; Kirill Pavlov; Anil K Rustgi; Carlo C Maley
Journal:  J Cell Physiol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 6.384

Review 5.  Barrett oesophagus: lessons on its origins from the lesion itself.

Authors:  Stuart A C McDonald; Danielle Lavery; Nicholas A Wright; Marnix Jansen
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 46.802

6.  Effects of estrogen on esophageal function through regulation of Ca2+-related proteins.

Authors:  Kipung Kim; Dongoh Lee; Changhwan Ahn; Hee Young Kang; Beum-Soo An; Yeon Hee Seong; Eui-Bae Jeung
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 7.527

7.  Induction of MUC5AC mucin by conjugated bile acids in the esophagus involves the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/protein kinase C/activator protein-1 pathway.

Authors:  Shumei Song; James C Byrd; Sushovan Guha; Kai-Feng Liu; Dimpy Koul; Robert S Bresalier
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2010-12-14       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  MUC2 expression is an adverse prognostic factor in superficial gastroesophageal adenocarcinomas.

Authors:  Jon M Davison; Shane T Ellis; Tyler J Foxwell; James D Luketich; Michael K Gibson; Shih-Fan Kuan; Katie S Nason
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  2013-10-30       Impact factor: 3.466

9.  Esophageal remodeling develops as a consequence of tissue specific IL-5-induced eosinophilia.

Authors:  Anil Mishra; Meiqin Wang; Venkatarajani R Pemmaraju; Margaret H Collins; Patricia C Fulkerson; J Pablo Abonia; Carine Blanchard; Philip E Putnam; Marc E Rothenberg
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2007-10-05       Impact factor: 22.682

10.  Expression analysis of Barrett's esophagus-associated high-grade dysplasia in laser capture microdissected archival tissue.

Authors:  Edmond Sabo; Patricia A Meitner; Rosemarie Tavares; Christopher L Corless; Gregory Y Lauwers; Steven F Moss; Murray B Resnick
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 12.531

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.