Ronald Gijsen1, Marinus J J C Poos. 1. National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, The Netherlands. ronald.gijsen@rivm.nl
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Examining the possibility of using data from registries in general practice in order to present morbidity figures concerning a broad range of major diseases for the Dutch population. STUDY DESIGN: Qualitative and quantitative analysis of registered diagnoses. METHODS: Quantitative data from six registries were obtained. In addition, information about the registration process was obtained and discussed with representatives of the registries. Subjects for discussion were the general characteristics of the registries and disease-specific rules. RESULTS: Some important differences exist in the characteristics of the registries and the disease-specific coding rules for computing incidence and prevalence. However, for most diseases the rules of two or more registries corresponded with each other, so that a selection of registries that measured the occurrence of a particular disease in a similar way could be made. Nevertheless, for some age categories rather large differences between registries were observed. The best estimates for the whole country were calculated as the average incidence and prevalence of the selected registries. CONCLUSIONS: Data that were originally obtained during patient care can be made usable for public health policy purposes. To further improve the quality of data and to increase the usefulness of these data for public health policy purposes, more efforts are required.
OBJECTIVE: Examining the possibility of using data from registries in general practice in order to present morbidity figures concerning a broad range of major diseases for the Dutch population. STUDY DESIGN: Qualitative and quantitative analysis of registered diagnoses. METHODS: Quantitative data from six registries were obtained. In addition, information about the registration process was obtained and discussed with representatives of the registries. Subjects for discussion were the general characteristics of the registries and disease-specific rules. RESULTS: Some important differences exist in the characteristics of the registries and the disease-specific coding rules for computing incidence and prevalence. However, for most diseases the rules of two or more registries corresponded with each other, so that a selection of registries that measured the occurrence of a particular disease in a similar way could be made. Nevertheless, for some age categories rather large differences between registries were observed. The best estimates for the whole country were calculated as the average incidence and prevalence of the selected registries. CONCLUSIONS: Data that were originally obtained during patient care can be made usable for public health policy purposes. To further improve the quality of data and to increase the usefulness of these data for public health policy purposes, more efforts are required.
Authors: C van den Dungen; N Hoeymans; H C Boshuizen; M van den Akker; M C J Biermans; K van Boven; H J Brouwer; R A Verheij; M W M de Waal; F G Schellevis; G P Westert Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2011-11-24 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: C van den Dungen; N Hoeymans; M van den Akker; M C J Biermans; K van Boven; J H K Joosten; R A Verheij; M W M de Waal; F G Schellevis; J A M van Oers Journal: BMC Fam Pract Date: 2014-10-30 Impact factor: 2.497
Authors: Hendrike C Boshuizen; Marinus J J C Poos; Marjan van den Akker; Kees van Boven; Joke C Korevaar; Margot W M de Waal; Marion C J Biermans; Nancy Hoeymans Journal: Popul Health Metr Date: 2017-04-05
Authors: Yvette M Weesie; Karin Hek; Tjard R J Schermer; Francois G Schellevis; Hubertus G M Leufkens; Elisabeth J Rook; Liset van Dijk Journal: Front Pharmacol Date: 2020-05-14 Impact factor: 5.810
Authors: Kirsti M Jakobs; Anne Posthuma; Wim J C de Grauw; Bianca W M Schalk; Reinier P Akkermans; Peter Lucassen; Tjard Schermer; Willem J J Assendelft; Marion J C Biermans Journal: BMC Fam Pract Date: 2020-07-29 Impact factor: 2.497
Authors: Juan F Orueta; Roberto Nuño-Solinis; Maider Mateos; Itziar Vergara; Gonzalo Grandes; Santiago Esnaola Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2012-10-22 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Ruth Hoffmans; Tjard Schermer; Karin van der Linde; Hans Bor; Kees van Boven; Chris van Weel; Wytske Fokkens Journal: BMC Fam Pract Date: 2015-09-11 Impact factor: 2.497
Authors: Šefket Šabanović; Majnarić Trtica Ljiljana; František Babič; Michal Vadovský; Ján Paralič; Aleksandar Včev; Andreas Holzinger Journal: BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Date: 2018-04-02 Impact factor: 2.796