Literature DB >> 16949498

What is the prognostic value of myocardial perfusion imaging using rubidium-82 positron emission tomography?

Keiichiro Yoshinaga1, Benjamin J W Chow, Kathryn Williams, Li Chen, Robert A deKemp, Linda Garrard, Alexander Lok-Tin Szeto, May Aung, Ross A Davies, Terrence D Ruddy, Rob S B Beanlands.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The objective was to determine the prognostic value of rubidium-82 (82Rb) positron emission tomography (PET) myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI).
BACKGROUND: 82Rb PET MPI accurately diagnoses coronary artery disease (CAD). However, there are limited data evaluating its prognostic value.
METHODS: Follow-up (3.1 +/- 0.9 years) was obtained in 367 patients who underwent dipyridamole 82Rb PET MPI. Patients were divided into groups based on their summed stress score (SSS): group I, normal (<4); group II, mild (4 to 7); and group III, moderate (8 to 11) to severe (> or =12).
RESULTS: There were significant differences among patients in the 3 SSS groups for hard events (cardiac death and myocardial infarction [MI]) (p < 0.001) and total cardiac events (hard events, revascularization and hospitalization) (p < 0.001). The annual hard events rates were 0.4%, 2.3%, and 7.0% in the normal, mild, and moderate-severe groups, respectively. In adjusted survival models, 82Rb PET SSS was the strongest predictor of total cardiac events and a significant predictor of hard events. Among patients referred for PET after 99mTc single-photon emission computed tomography, the annual total event rate was higher with abnormal versus normal SSS on PET (15.2% vs. 1.3%, p < 0.001). In patients with obesity, the annual total event rate was 11.1% with an abnormal scan and 1.5% with a normal scan (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that 82Rb PET MPI has significant prognostic value for predicting cardiac events, including death and MI. It also seems to have prognostic value in patients whose diagnosis remains uncertain after single-photon emission computed tomography MPI and in obese patients. The prognostic value of PET MPI may improve the management of cardiac patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16949498     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.06.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  91 in total

Review 1.  Multimodality cardiovascular molecular imaging technology.

Authors:  Matthew O'Donnell; Elliot R McVeigh; H William Strauss; Atsushi Tanaka; Brett E Bouma; Guillermo J Tearney; Michael A Guttman; Ernest V Garcia
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2010-05-01       Impact factor: 10.057

2.  Patient-centered imaging.

Authors:  E Gordon Depuey; John J Mahmarian; Todd D Miller; Andrew J Einstein; Christopher L Hansen; Thomas A Holly; Edward J Miller; Donna M Polk; L Samuel Wann
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 3.  Myocardial perfusion scintigraphy: past, present and future.

Authors:  A Notghi; C S Low
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 4.  Prognosis in the era of comparative effectiveness research: where is nuclear cardiology now and where should it be?

Authors:  Leslee J Shaw; Fadi G Hage; Daniel S Berman; Rory Hachamovitch; Ami Iskandrian
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 5.952

5.  Intra- and inter-operator repeatability of myocardial blood flow and myocardial flow reserve measurements using rubidium-82 pet and a highly automated analysis program.

Authors:  Ran Klein; Jennifer M Renaud; Maria C Ziadi; Stephanie L Thorn; Andy Adler; Rob S Beanlands; Robert A deKemp
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2010-04-13       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 6.  The clinical utility of assessing myocardial blood flow using positron emission tomography.

Authors:  Maria Cecilia Ziadi; Rob S B Beanlands
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 5.952

7.  Diagnosis and prognosis of coronary artery disease: PET is superior to SPECT: Pro.

Authors:  Rob S B Beanlands; George Youssef
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 5.952

8.  Quantitative analysis of coronary endothelial function with generator-produced 82Rb PET: comparison with 15O-labelled water PET.

Authors:  Keiichiro Yoshinaga; Osamu Manabe; Chietsugu Katoh; Li Chen; Ran Klein; Masanao Naya; Robert A deKemp; Kathryn Williams; Rob S B Beanlands; Nagara Tamaki
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2010-07-13       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 9.  Non-invasive imaging in coronary artery disease including anatomical and functional evaluation of ischaemia and viability assessment.

Authors:  M Pakkal; V Raj; G P McCann
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.039

10.  Interaction of impaired coronary flow reserve and cardiomyocyte injury on adverse cardiovascular outcomes in patients without overt coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Viviany R Taqueti; Brendan M Everett; Venkatesh L Murthy; Mariya Gaber; Courtney R Foster; Jon Hainer; Ron Blankstein; Sharmila Dorbala; Marcelo F Di Carli
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2014-12-05       Impact factor: 29.690

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.