Literature DB >> 16949428

Are the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality obstetric trauma indicators valid measures of hospital safety?

William A Grobman1, Joe Feinglass, Sumithra Murthy.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to examine whether the United States Agency for Health Care Research and Quality obstetric patient safety indicators are significantly affected by patient-specific and hospital-level characteristics not related to the safety environment. STUDY
DESIGN: Administrative data for all nonfederal Illinois hospitals in 2001 were used to analyze the association of a hospital's obstetric trauma rates with patient and hospital-level factors. Multivariable random effects logistic regression analyses was used to account for hospital-level clustering.
RESULTS: A total of 175,374 deliveries from 142 Illinois hospitals were available for analysis. The frequency of obstetric trauma was significantly associated with multiple patient-specific and hospital-level factors. Specifically, for any vaginal delivery, premature delivery, multiple gestation, excessive fetal growth, and prolonged pregnancy was associated with obstetric trauma risk. For spontaneous delivery, a prior cesarean was associated with trauma risk as well. Maternal age was associated with trauma risk at cesarean as well as at vaginal delivery. With regard to hospital-level factors, a higher annual delivery volume and a higher cesarean rate were associated with increased risk of trauma with either type of vaginal delivery, whereas in the intensity with which hospitals coded their medical records was associated with trauma risk for all routes of delivery.
CONCLUSION: The risk of obstetric trauma is significantly influenced by both patient and hospital characteristics and is not a good indicator of patient safety.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16949428     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2006.06.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  12 in total

1.  The association between hospital obstetrical volume and maternal postpartum complications.

Authors:  Kathy L Kyser; Xin Lu; Donna A Santillan; Mark K Santillan; Stephen K Hunter; Alison G Cahill; Peter Cram
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-05-16       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  Can differences in obstetric outcomes be explained by differences in the care provided? The MFMU Network APEX study.

Authors:  William A Grobman; Jennifer L Bailit; Madeline Murguia Rice; Ronald J Wapner; Michael W Varner; John M Thorp; Kenneth J Leveno; Steve N Caritis; Jay D Iams; Alan T Tita; George Saade; Yoram Sorokin; Dwight J Rouse; Jorge E Tolosa; J Peter Van Dorsten
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Site of delivery contribution to black-white severe maternal morbidity disparity.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Howell; Natalia N Egorova; Amy Balbierz; Jennifer Zeitlin; Paul L Hebert
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-05-12       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  Association between hospital-level obstetric quality indicators and maternal and neonatal morbidity.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Howell; Jennifer Zeitlin; Paul L Hebert; Amy Balbierz; Natalia Egorova
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2014-10-15       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Effect of hospital setting and volume on clinical outcomes in women with gestational and type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  W K Nicholson; F Witter; N R Powe
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 2.681

6.  Risk-adjusted models for adverse obstetric outcomes and variation in risk-adjusted outcomes across hospitals.

Authors:  Jennifer L Bailit; William A Grobman; Madeline Murguia Rice; Catherine Y Spong; Ronald J Wapner; Michael W Varner; John M Thorp; Kenneth J Leveno; Steve N Caritis; Phillip J Shubert; Alan T Tita; George Saade; Yoram Sorokin; Dwight J Rouse; Sean C Blackwell; Jorge E Tolosa; J Peter Van Dorsten
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 8.661

7.  Effect of hospital volume on maternal outcomes in women with prior cesarean delivery undergoing trial of labor.

Authors:  Jen Jen Chang; David M Stamilio; George A Macones
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2008-01-11       Impact factor: 4.897

8.  Delivery Complications and Postpartum Hospital Use in California.

Authors:  Chen Y Wang; Lynn M Yee; Joseph M Feinglass
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2021-09-25

9.  Severe Maternal Morbidity Among Hispanic Women in New York City: Investigation of Health Disparities.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Howell; Natalia N Egorova; Teresa Janevic; Amy Balbierz; Jennifer Zeitlin; Paul L Hebert
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 7.623

10.  Race and Ethnicity, Medical Insurance, and Within-Hospital Severe Maternal Morbidity Disparities.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Howell; Natalia N Egorova; Teresa Janevic; Michael Brodman; Amy Balbierz; Jennifer Zeitlin; Paul L Hebert
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 7.623

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.