Literature DB >> 16949348

Recruitment of the elderly into a pharmacologic prevention trial: the Ginkgo Evaluation of Memory Study experience.

Annette L Fitzpatrick1, Linda P Fried, Jeff Williamson, Patricia Crowley, Delilah Posey, Linly Kwong, Janet Bonk, Roberta Moyer, Joyce Chabot, Lara Kidoguchi, Curt D Furberg, Steven T DeKosky.   

Abstract

The difficulty involved in recruiting healthy older adults into clinical trials, especially those involving pharmacologic agents, is an important issue in research. The Ginkgo Evaluation of Memory (GEM) Study, a double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial evaluating Ginkgo biloba to prevent dementia, successfully recruited 3072 participants age 75 years and older at four U.S. sites from September 2000 through June 2002. Using targeted mailing lists, an estimated 243,400 study brochures were mailed out to potential participants. Subsequent attempts were made to reach 14,603 households by telephone, from which 12,186 (83.4%) successful contacts were made. Overall, telephone or in-person evaluations identified 2149 (17.6%) ineligible persons for cognitive (20.6%), medical (49.4%), or other (30.0%) reasons. A total of 6944 (57.0%) refused participation resulting in 3072 enrolled into the study, a recruitment rate of 25.2% based on telephone contacts made or 1.3% of all mailed brochures. Recruitment rates were stable over the 21-month enrollment period but were higher for the two urban centers than the two rural ones. Recruitment was dependent most on mailing lists available, density of older adults in the catchment areas, and Institutional Review Board restrictions. Men and persons under age 85 were more likely to enroll. Primary reason for refusals involved lack of interest (48.4%) or self-perceived poor health (16.2%). Over 9% were unwilling to give up current Ginkgo supplementation or would not accept assignment to placebo. An additional 7% did not want another medication and almost 4% had care-giving responsibilities which prevented involvement. Mass mailings were the most successful approach for recruitment at all four sites and the method through which the vast majority of interviewees had learned about the study. Information on the experience of the GEM Study recruitment may be helpful to other clinical trials attempting to randomize older adults into prevention trials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16949348     DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2006.06.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials        ISSN: 1551-7144            Impact factor:   2.226


  31 in total

1.  A web-based screening and accrual strategy for a cancer prevention clinical trial in healthy smokers.

Authors:  Arash Mohebati; Allison Knutson; Xi Kathy Zhou; Judith J Smith; Powel H Brown; Andrew J Dannenberg; Eva Szabo
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2012-07-05       Impact factor: 2.226

2.  Recruiting the Oldest-old for Clinical Research.

Authors:  Zarui A Melikyan; Dana E Greenia; Maria M Corrada; Marilyn M Hester; Claudia H Kawas; Joshua D Grill
Journal:  Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord       Date:  2019 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.703

3.  Functional and cognitive criteria produce different rates of mild cognitive impairment and conversion to dementia.

Authors:  J Saxton; B E Snitz; O L Lopez; D G Ives; L O Dunn; A Fitzpatrick; M C Carlson; S T Dekosky
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2009-03-11       Impact factor: 10.154

4.  Alcohol Consumption, Brain Amyloid-β Deposition, and Brain Structural Integrity Among Older Adults Free of Dementia.

Authors:  Manja Koch; Simona Costanzo; Annette L Fitzpatrick; Oscar L Lopez; Steven DeKosky; Lewis H Kuller; Julie Price; Rachel H Mackey; Majken K Jensen; Kenneth J Mukamal
Journal:  J Alzheimers Dis       Date:  2020       Impact factor: 4.472

5.  Personality and medication non-adherence among older adults enrolled in a six-year trial.

Authors:  Anthony Jerant; Benjamin Chapman; Paul Duberstein; John Robbins; Peter Franks
Journal:  Br J Health Psychol       Date:  2011-02

Review 6.  Facilitating Alzheimer disease research recruitment.

Authors:  Joshua D Grill; James E Galvin
Journal:  Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord       Date:  2014 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.703

7.  Embedding clinical interventions into observational studies.

Authors:  Anne B Newman; M Larissa Avilés-Santa; Garnet Anderson; Gerardo Heiss; Wm James Howard; Mitchell Krucoff; Lewis H Kuller; Cora E Lewis; Jennifer G Robinson; Herman Taylor; Roberto P Treviño; William Weintraub
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2015-12-02       Impact factor: 2.226

8.  Recruitment methods in Alzheimer's disease research: general practice versus population based screening by mail.

Authors:  Fred Andersen; Torgeir A Engstad; Bjørn Straume; Matti Viitanen; Dag S Halvorsen; Samuel Hykkerud; Kjell Sjøbrend
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2010-04-29       Impact factor: 4.615

9.  Comparison of the design differences between the Ginkgo Evaluation of Memory study and the GuidAge study.

Authors:  J D Williamson; B Vellas; C Furberg; R Nahin; S T Dekosky
Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 4.075

10.  Recruitment and retention of older adults in aging research.

Authors:  Lona Mody; Douglas K Miller; Joanne M McGloin; Marcie Freeman; Edward R Marcantonio; Jay Magaziner; Stephanie Studenski
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 5.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.