Literature DB >> 16949303

Inhibition and generation of saccades: rapid event-related fMRI of prosaccades, antisaccades, and nogo trials.

Matthew R G Brown1, Herbert C Goltz, Tutis Vilis, Kristen A Ford, Stefan Everling.   

Abstract

Flexible, adaptive behavior often requires the inhibition of automatic responses in favor of voluntary response generation. The antisaccade task requires active inhibition of the automatic saccade to a peripheral stimulus followed by generation of a voluntary antisaccade to the opposite location. Previous studies demonstrated greater functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) activation for antisaccades than prosaccades in cortical saccade areas but did not distinguish the relative contributions of saccadic inhibition and generation. To address this question, we compared prosaccades, antisaccades, and nogo trials in a rapid event-related fMRI experiment with ten human subjects (6 female, 4 male). Trials were compound, containing a colored fixation point to cue trial type, followed by a 200-ms gap and then peripheral stimulus presentation and response. Required responses for prosaccade, antisaccade, and nogo trials, respectively, were to generate a saccade to the stimulus, look away from it, and inhibit the automatic saccade while maintaining central fixation. Frontal and supplementary eye fields, anterior cingulate cortex, intraparietal sulcus, and precuneus, exhibited surprisingly similar activation patterns for prosaccade and nogo responses, suggesting that BOLD signal in cortical saccade regions might predominantly reflect visual detection and attention processes rather than saccade generation or inhibition. These regions displayed greater activation for antisaccade responses versus prosaccade or nogo responses, possibly due to visuospatial remapping or increased attention levels in the antisaccade task. In right superior frontal sulcus, right supramarginal gyrus, and posterior cingulate sulcus, activation was greater for nogo compared to prosaccade responses, suggesting a role in active saccadic inhibition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16949303     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.07.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  57 in total

1.  Vector inversion diminishes the online control of antisaccades.

Authors:  Matthew Heath; Jeffrey Weiler; Kendall Marriott; Timothy N Welsh
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-01-06       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Follow-up evaluation of oculomotor performance with fMRI in the subacute phase of concussion.

Authors:  Brian Johnson; Mark Hallett; Semyon Slobounov
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 9.910

3.  Meta-analytic evidence for a superordinate cognitive control network subserving diverse executive functions.

Authors:  Tara A Niendam; Angela R Laird; Kimberly L Ray; Y Monica Dean; David C Glahn; Cameron S Carter
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 3.282

4.  Saccade preparation signals in the human frontal and parietal cortices.

Authors:  Clayton E Curtis; Jason D Connolly
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-11-21       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Different cortical activations during visuospatial attention and the intention to perform a saccade.

Authors:  C S Konen; R Kleiser; F Bremmer; R J Seitz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-07-06       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Maturational changes in anterior cingulate and frontoparietal recruitment support the development of error processing and inhibitory control.

Authors:  Katerina Velanova; Mark E Wheeler; Beatriz Luna
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2008-02-14       Impact factor: 5.357

7.  Having to identify a target reduces latencies in prosaccades but not in antisaccades.

Authors:  Nathalie Guyader; Jennifer Malsert; Christian Marendaz
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2008-12-23

8.  The functional oculomotor network and saccadic cognitive control in healthy elders.

Authors:  Judy Pa; Shubir Dutt; Jacob B Mirsky; Hilary W Heuer; Paul Keselman; Erwin Kong; Andrew Trujillo; Adam Gazzaley; Joel H Kramer; William W Seeley; Bruce L Miller; Adam L Boxer
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2014-03-24       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 9.  Remember the future II: meta-analyses and functional overlap of working memory and delay discounting.

Authors:  Michael J Wesley; Warren K Bickel
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2013-09-13       Impact factor: 13.382

10.  Immaturities in reward processing and its influence on inhibitory control in adolescence.

Authors:  C F Geier; R Terwilliger; T Teslovich; K Velanova; B Luna
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2009-10-29       Impact factor: 5.357

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.