Literature DB >> 1694718

Ploidy level determinations in high-grade and low-grade malignant variants of prostatic carcinoma.

G Forsslund1, A Zetterberg.   

Abstract

Ploidy level determinations of prostatic carcinoma in 213 patients selected on the basis of survival time were analyzed. Two extreme groups were chosen: extreme group 1, 131 patients who died from prostatic cancer within 3 years of diagnosis; and extreme group 2, 82 patients who survived for more than 15 years after diagnosis. All patients were diagnosed by fine needle aspiration biopsy. The DNA measurements were performed on Feulgen stained, destained May-Grünwald-Giemsa smears. The DNA distribution patterns were studied in three benign prostatic lesions as a base for analyses of prostatic carcinoma. By choosing two extreme groups it was possible to evaluate in detail the optimal limits for defining the diploid 2c region and the tetraploid 4c region. Various limits were tested in order to determine those which most clearly separate extreme group 1 from extreme group 2. We found that the optimal upper diploid limit was 2.5c and the optimal tetraploid limits were 3.5c-4.5c. By using these limits to determine the percentage of aberrant tumor cells, i.e., non-2c and non-4c, and combining this with the modal value (in c units) of the tumor cell population the tumors could unambiguously be divided into D-, T-, and A-types. D/T-type tumors were found only in extreme group 2 and had less than 30% aberrant tumor cells, while A-type tumors (high-grade aneuploid) had greater than 50% non-2c and non-4c tumor cells. All A-type tumors were found in extreme group 1. In order to investigate whether the classification of tumors into D-, T-, and A-type was valid in general and could also be applied to patients with survival time between the two extreme groups (3-15 years), a material of 79 patients with a wide range of survival times was tested. The tumors were classified according to the above-mentioned criteria into A-, D-, and T-type tumors. All patients who died within 5 years of diagnosis had A-type tumors. All patients who lived greater than 5 years from diagnosis had D- or T-type tumors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 1694718

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Res        ISSN: 0008-5472            Impact factor:   12.701


  10 in total

1.  Genomic architecture characterizes tumor progression paths and fate in breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Hege G Russnes; Hans Kristian Moen Vollan; Ole Christian Lingjærde; Alexander Krasnitz; Pär Lundin; Bjørn Naume; Therese Sørlie; Elin Borgen; Inga H Rye; Anita Langerød; Suet-Feung Chin; Andrew E Teschendorff; Philip J Stephens; Susanne Månér; Ellen Schlichting; Lars O Baumbusch; Rolf Kåresen; Michael P Stratton; Michael Wigler; Carlos Caldas; Anders Zetterberg; James Hicks; Anne-Lise Børresen-Dale
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2010-06-30       Impact factor: 17.956

2.  Novel patterns of genome rearrangement and their association with survival in breast cancer.

Authors:  James Hicks; Alexander Krasnitz; B Lakshmi; Nicholas E Navin; Michael Riggs; Evan Leibu; Diane Esposito; Joan Alexander; Jen Troge; Vladimir Grubor; Seungtai Yoon; Michael Wigler; Kenny Ye; Anne-Lise Børresen-Dale; Bjørn Naume; Ellen Schlicting; Larry Norton; Torsten Hägerström; Lambert Skoog; Gert Auer; Susanne Månér; Pär Lundin; Anders Zetterberg
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 9.043

3.  RAD51 can inhibit PDGF-B-induced gliomagenesis and genomic instability.

Authors:  Ulrica K Westermark; Nanna Lindberg; Pernilla Roswall; Daniel Bråsäter; Hildur R Helgadottir; Sanna-Maria Hede; Anders Zetterberg; Maria Jasin; Monica Nistér; Lene Uhrbom
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2011-09-16       Impact factor: 12.300

4.  Neoplastic transformation of prostatic and urogenital epithelium by the polyoma virus middle T gene.

Authors:  A Tehranian; D W Morris; B H Min; D J Bird; R D Cardiff; P A Barry
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 4.307

5.  DNA-ploidy, G2M-fractions and prognosis of stages B and C prostate carcinoma.

Authors:  J G Müller; S Demel; M P Wirth; A Manseck; H G Frohmüller; H A Müller
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 4.064

6.  Flow and image cytometric study of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours: frequent DNA aneuploidy and an association with the clinical outcome.

Authors:  K A Alanen; U G Falkmer; P J Klemi; H Joensuu; S Falkmer
Journal:  Virchows Arch A Pathol Anat Histopathol       Date:  1992

7.  Quantitative pathology: historical background, clinical research and application of nuclear morphometry and DNA image cytometry.

Authors:  Abdelbaset Buhmeida
Journal:  Libyan J Med       Date:  2006-09-20       Impact factor: 1.657

8.  Prognostic factors in prostate cancer.

Authors:  A Buhmeida; S Pyrhönen; M Laato; Y Collan
Journal:  Diagn Pathol       Date:  2006-04-03       Impact factor: 2.644

9.  A role for polyploidy in the tumorigenicity of Pim-1-expressing human prostate and mammary epithelial cells.

Authors:  Meejeon Roh; Omar E Franco; Simon W Hayward; Riet van der Meer; Sarki A Abdulkadir
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-07-02       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Genomic instability and proliferative activity as risk factors for distant metastases in breast cancer.

Authors:  L Li; K Mu; G Zhou; L Lan; G Auer; A Zetterberg
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2008-08-05       Impact factor: 7.640

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.